They have no idea what they are doing. There is nothing science related about anything COVID.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/01/h...s-britain.html
Printable View
They have no idea what they are doing. There is nothing science related about anything COVID.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/01/h...s-britain.html
"Some animals or people who received the vaccine and were later exposed to the virus developed more severe disease than those who had not been vaccinated (1). The vaccine-primed immune system, in certain cases, seemed to launch a shoddy response to the natural infection. “That is something we want to avoid,” says Kanta Subbarao, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza in Melbourne, Australia."
https://www.pnas.org/content/117/15/8218
Even in Canada they are messing around with the second dose .
7 long term residents are sick in a home in Quebec after taking the first dose .
This 2 part dose said it always failed because of this problem getting back on time for the second dose can be tricky . It was mentioned months ago .
Seems like they will have to plan this in with their injection planning.
https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/mobile/s...ters-1.5265389
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
There seems to be a plethora of articles,lately,promoted by the "antivaxxers" that we should really take with a huge grain of salt.
An entire news article about nothing... It does contain the paragraph:Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood
"The outbreak doesn't suggest anything new about the vaccine—it was already clear it doesn't give full protection with a single dose, nor right away—but it is highlighting worries in Quebec, where people are already on edge about the province’s “off-label” vaccination campaign and the contradictory information around it."
With only 80% efficacy after one dose, this is expected.
The article also notes:
"The seven new cases add urgency to the families’ worries, Shanks said, despite the fact that the cases were “not surprising,” she said.
“There have always been active cases and staff cases [at Maimonides],” she said. “There was never a belief that there would be no new cases… COVID was circulating in the building.”
It is your body and your choice to make an informed decision.Quote:
Originally Posted by trimmer21
Some vaccines and drugs are good.........others, not so much especially when rushed to market without proper testing under the guise "Approved for Emergency distribution". When Pharma eliminates safety protocols you become the Guinea pig.
It was towards how Quebec was going to delay the second dose.Quote:
Originally Posted by werner.reiche
Quebec took the road to inject everyone with a first dose and delay the second.
Now they are being threaten with a law suit if they do not receive that second dose.
Like promised.
Why are they trying to delay the second dose ? What happens and there is a mess up and can't get the second dose ?
That's what I was referring to that's the problem with a second dose yet they want to delay it.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
Was posted last week Quebec wont receive second shot on time.
They put all the eggs in the first shot . What happens if there is a mess up and the second dose is late ? https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montr...lays-1.5861194
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
Again I wasn't talking the out breakQuote:
Originally Posted by werner.reiche
First line said Even Canada is messing around with the second dose.
Then I commented on the residents .
Then I proceeded to comment on how this 2 part vaccine always failed because of the second dose timing.
Example . Quebec thought it would be better to delay the second shot to give out more of the first dose. Bad idea that is even the vaccine company said it was a bad idea.
Hence why I said they need to plan this second dose in with their injection plan.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
We live in a society where we have been trained, due to bombardment of information, to move too fast for science to keep up.
Society are starting to believe it is acceptable to curtail or outright ignore science, simply in order to have things faster and cheaper.
The ones who benefit financially from this, can also rely on this very issue, to ensure nothing can be proven against them ... it is almost
impossible to link a disease that occurs years later to a particular event ... unless there is tonnes of science behind the study ... and even then ...
God help us.