Originally Posted by
Gun Nut
Actually the whole country rests on native land. We only treated for a right to use the land for our purposes. On ceded land the rights to use it, for indigenous purposes have been extinguished, that doesn’t make the land any less theirs. Land ownership flows from the rights of first discovery and the Indigenous People as the word indigenous implies were here first. The term unceded land implies they have the right to use their land as they see fit, for their purposes. At least that is my understanding of the matter. Under Royal Proclamation, the rights on the land were to be treated for by the crown, third parties were to only purchase land rights from the crown after the rights had been treated for. Third party were not to deal directly with the indigenous people for land rights. The crown was also obligated to ensure that no third parties were supposed to encroach or interfere with unceded land without government clearance or license. Needless to say in the interest of extending this country from sea to sea. Some of the aspects of the Royal Proclamation may have fallen by the way side, and that why this country is in the mess that it is.
You don’t stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut.