September 13th employees must show proof of vaccination and full vaccination by October 30
Going to get interesting in the next couple months.
Printable View
September 13th employees must show proof of vaccination and full vaccination by October 30
Going to get interesting in the next couple months.
So far the lawyer's advice has been heeded where 'mandatory vaccinations are required: those that refuse will only be subjected to more testing and monitoring. Worth the inconvenience for standing your convictions and your rights.
Testing is also considered to be a medical intervention when a device (swab) is inserted into a body cavity.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
Going to get real interesting for sure!
Mouth and throat swabs are also acceptable..that one that jams it so far into the nasal cavity is actually is taking a sample of your grey matter to confirm who is stupid enough to allow them to do it. HaHa..Quote:
Originally Posted by impact
The devil is in the details.
This is why Patrick King won his case in Alberta. The crown cannot even prove that covid exists hence no informed consent.
"A medical procedure is a course of action intended to achieve a result in the delivery of healthcare."
"A medical procedure with the intention of determining, measuring, or diagnosing a patient condition or parameter is also called a medical test. Other common kinds of procedures are therapeutic (i.e., intended to treat, cure, or restore function or structure), such as surgical and physical rehabilitation procedures."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_procedure
Requirements for valid consent
For consent to serve as a defense to allegations of either negligence or assault and battery, it must meet certain requirements. The consent must have been voluntary, the patient must have had the capacity to consent and the patient must have been properly informed.
Voluntary consent
Patients must always be free to consent to or refuse treatment, and be free of any suggestion of duress or coercion. Consent obtained under any suggestion of compulsion either by the actions or words of the physician or others may be no consent at all and therefore may be successfully repudiated. In this context physicians must keep clearly in mind there may be circumstances when the initiative to consult a physician was not the patient's, but was rather that of a third party, a friend, an employer, or even a police officer. Under such circumstances the physician may be well aware that the patient is only very reluctantly following the course of action suggested or insisted upon by a third person. Then, physicians should be more than usually careful to assure themselves patients are in full agreement with what has been suggested, that there has been no coercion and that the will of other persons has not been imposed on the patient.
The bottom line:
Consent obtained under any suggestion of compulsion either by the actions or words of the doctor or others may be no consent at all and therefore may be successfully repudiated.
https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/en/advice-p...s#requirements
Here is a great resource link on how to say "NO" to vaccines and testing.
https://awakecanada.org/tactful-no/
....and the union now standing behind its members.
The corrupt politicians house of cards are falling apart.
"Sisters and Brothers,
I want all members to know that I am very concerned about the TTC announcement today regarding mandatory vaccination.
Local 113 supports the right of every member of Local 113 to make their own informed decisions about their personal health matters, including vaccination. We oppose mandatory vaccination of Local 113 members.
As Mr. Leary said in his statement earlier today, the TTC has made this announcement without having crafted a policy. The TTC has clearly not finalized how any potential policy will work, or made clear what alternatives to vaccination (if any) will be offered. The TTC has also not made clear what consequences (if any) will flow from a member’s refusal to be vaccinated.
Whatever the TTC ultimately determines, please know that Local 113 will aggressively oppose any action of the TTC which violates the rights of any member, whether it be unreasonable exercise of management’s rights, an express violation of the Collective Agreement, or a violation of the law, including the Human Rights Code.
As always, please do not hesitate to contact me, your Board Member, or any Local 113 officer to discuss this or any other issue.
Carlos Santos
President of ATU Local 113"
https://wemovetoronto.ca/member-upda...accine-policy/
The only union I think I've read that backs the Mandatory Vaccination is, you guessed it, the teachers Union Haha..
Good to see that this far from over...
it is for all city workers actually not just ttc. my father got the email explaining it recently, need to have both vax by nov i believe
Funny how city workers working out doors is mandatory but Ontario teacher's are not mandatory working in rooms full of kids.
Where the logic in that ?
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk