Hunters say firearms ban didn't affect hunting season

Anyone consider the fact that we are now entering a period of political unrest and the ban is simply to disarm extremist groups and prevent an uprising. These type of guns appeal to some more than others. Personally, I have no problem with any on the list as I regard firearms as a tool.
There is a considerable amount of P.O.ed people in Alberta at the moment and loudly voicing their opinions. Don't rely on MSM to report any of it. You have to dig a little deeper.

https://www.thetelegram.com/news/can...report-304363/

Hahaha! So its just guys with AR15 that might go postal....not the ones carrying semi .308s and 30.06 because of the wood stock?

Damn them black rifles must have a mind of their own.


What about all the new Canadians that come to this country from war torn countries and see all the HANDGUN shootings that happen daily in the city. All from illegal gun owners with illegal guns shooting each other over terroritory to deal illegal drugs...but ya the weekend warriors that shoot paper with their RESTRICTED 5.56 are the problem...what a crock of

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fox

Except that an AR-15 or variant has never been used in a mass shooting in Canada, not once, and it has been around since its inception.

Comparing us to the US with respect to gun laws, or many other things for that matter is idiotic and proves how blind people are in this country.

---

We have been through this discussion before and even without researching I find your statement wrong:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...onger%20be%20c

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trimmer21

Giving those folks who come to Canada from war-torn countries full credit for being as intelligent as they rest of us, I submit that they're well aware of the difference between "assault-style" (what a politically correct bullshyte coined term that is) and the real deal full auto combat rifle. They're not caught up in the nonsense because they're not the least bit fooled by semantics. I'm at a total loss to understand why people are so caught up in demonizing a specific rifle that works identically to your Remington 742 (except that an AR-15 fires a much smaller round). That simply defies all logic.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rick_iles

Optics !!!!! That has to be one of your dumbest posts, and there have been many ! So, “new Canadians” coming into this country will be upset because of a hunting rifle....so, are you saying we have to change our way of dressing, our holidays, our total way of life, because “ the optics may offend them !!!! You are way out to lunch there. Your Liebralness is showing big time !!!!!!

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MikePal

No kidding, I was wondering where Gilly sees guys with " weapons floating around in the hands of god now's who".

1st off off, since I left the military I've never seen guys with 'weapons' anywhere but on a Ceremonial Parade .

2nd unless these “new Canadians” or more commonly called immigrants, have stumbled onto a hunt camp or a shooting range while out on a stroll, it's not likely they ever see a gun, except maybe on a cop in the mall at the donut shop. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 410001661

X2........Plus I just wish the Liberals would state why they are going after certain guns.......admit the truth......because they LOOK scary? Maybe because we are being punished for what has happened in the US? Why is it that legally owned property can be OK to use, under the strict rules and regulations, one month and next month it is a danger to society?

I guess if he can do that with drugs he can do it with guns. Pot was illegal and considered harmful & dangerous to society one month and the next month it is not only legal - the government is now selling it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 410001661

"So another little thing you might want to consider is the optic's for many new Canadians, they come from war torn countries where the guns used were assault type rifles, to kill and maim them and relatives. The last thing they want to see in their new country is the same weapons floating around in the hands of god now's who."

Come to my gun range and see all the new Canadians that are members. This is a SPORT........yep, a real sport and it is gaining popularity.

I take it you are also offended by the Lancaster doing fly by's over the GTA or the Toronto air show

---

Well I can always tell when I hit the nerve endings, guess what lads this is where the votes come in. If your a new immigrant coming into Canada from a war torn country, the last thing you want to hear and see is an assault rifle. After the Mosque shooting's in Quebec, the Ecole Polytechnic, The East Coast shootings, RCMP officers getting gunned down and out armed, its over lads, done deal.

And herein lies the difference between a Conservative its all about the "me" and the Liberals its all about the "we". So far the we side is winning here and now in the USA.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trimmer21

Giving those folks who come to Canada from war-torn countries full credit for being as intelligent as they rest of us, I submit that they're well aware of the difference between "assault-style" (what a politically correct bullshyte coined term that is) and the real deal full auto combat rifle. They're not caught up in the nonsense because they're not the least bit fooled by semantics. I'm at a total loss to understand why people are so caught up in demonizing a specific rifle that works identically to your Remington 742 (except that an AR-15 fires a much smaller round). That simply defies all logic.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rick_iles

Optics !!!!! That has to be one of your dumbest posts, and there have been many ! So, “new Canadians” coming into this country will be upset because of a hunting rifle....so, are you saying we have to change our way of dressing, our holidays, our total way of life, because “ the optics may offend them !!!! You are way out to lunch there. Your Liebralness is showing big time !!!!!!

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MikePal

No kidding, I was wondering where Gilly sees guys with " weapons floating around in the hands of god now's who".

1st off off, since I left the military I've never seen guys with 'weapons' anywhere but on a Ceremonial Parade .

2nd unless these “new Canadians” or more commonly called immigrants, have stumbled onto a hunt camp or a shooting range while out on a stroll, it's not likely they ever see a gun, except maybe on a cop in the mall at the donut shop. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 410001661

X2........Plus I just wish the Liberals would state why they are going after certain guns.......admit the truth......because they LOOK scary? Maybe because we are being punished for what has happened in the US? Why is it that legally owned property can be OK to use, under the strict rules and regulations, one month and next month it is a danger to society?

I guess if he can do that with drugs he can do it with guns. Pot was illegal and considered harmful & dangerous to society one month and the next month it is not only legal - the government is now selling it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 410001661

"So another little thing you might want to consider is the optic's for many new Canadians, they come from war torn countries where the guns used were assault type rifles, to kill and maim them and relatives. The last thing they want to see in their new country is the same weapons floating around in the hands of god now's who."

Come to my gun range and see all the new Canadians that are members. This is a SPORT........yep, a real sport and it is gaining popularity.

I take it you are also offended by the Lancaster doing fly by's over the GTA or the Toronto air show

---

Maybe you would not be so sure of yourself if you faced the business end of some of these gun's you love so much.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilroy

We have been through this discussion before and even without researching I find your statement wrong:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...onger%20be%20c

---

No sir, you are wrong again.
How many people shot by gunman do you consider a mass shooting?

Wow Giily quotes from your entire fan club HaHa..

But a pretty lame attempt at a group 'zinger' ..have a little more libation and see if you can come up with something more worthy of your talents. HaHa.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by canadaman30

No sir, you are wrong again.
How many people shot by gunman do you consider a mass shooting?

---

I think Canada standards are 4 or more people

I can't see what he posted as I am not with globe and mail lol.

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilroy

Maybe you would not be so sure of yourself if you faced the business end of some of these gun's you love so much.

---

Licensed gun owners are nothing to fear. People that want to take away guns from licensed owners are the evil ones to fear.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishfood

I think Canada standards are 4 or more people

I can't see what he posted as I am not with globe and mail lol.

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

---

did not meet the standard...lol