OOD has sponsors, advertisers and promotions for fundraising too just like QDMA, is there a difference?
Printable View
"The Facts:"
QDMA was formed by Joe Hamilton and others in 1988. He was the first executive director.
Brian Murphy was hired by the association as executive director in 1995. There were 2 executive directors before he came on the scene.
Brian's education might have, in part, been at a fenced farm. I think this is typical of many wildlife researchers. However, he didn't start the organization or set their mandate, that was done by others with their own money and sweat equity. These prople weren't high fenced deer farmers, they were for the most part average guys that wanted to improve on what was being done at the time. For anyone interested in the truth, rather than a deliberately slanted & edited set of "facts" check out the following link.
https://www.qdma.com/about/mission-and-history/
The QDMA has been disingenuous with almost every aspect of their mandate and mission...trying to get the 'facts' from their literature is pointless...and providing the truth not found in their literature is not 'slanting' the facts, it's called fact checking.
When did they become a for-profit company? It's still a registered charity from what I can tell. Do you have a link?
https://secure3.convio.net/deer/site...221F3D20&idb=0
I’m bowing back out of this again…there will always be people who refuse to challenge their beliefs regardless of the facts that put them in question, better to call others dishonest than to accept that your being dishonest with yourself.
All in all, this has become a pointless exercise.
Ta ta
I see no difference between QDMA, Delta Waterfowl, Ducks Unlimited, NWTF, Ruffed Grouse Society, or Pheasants Forever. They are all charitable or non-profit organizations trying to enhance the habitat and well being of a specific animal group. They all have on-line stores selling a variety of products to produce revenue for their projects, as well as other fund raisers. I'm sure you could find people with a bug up their arse for any of these organizations, but, as far as I'm concerned, even though I may not agree with all their philosophies, they are helping the various wildlife they are associated with, as well as other collateral species.
Well stated. To each his own. Unless an organization is deliberately spreading lies and causing harm or a limitation on others rights (PETA for example) then why slam it and knock others because they choose to belong? I think NWTF does a lot of good work but I quit supporting them when they pulled out of Canada years ago. I'd never knock someone else for supporting them though.