The plot thickens. lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Oddmott
Printable View
The plot thickens. lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Oddmott
Interestingly enough. Can't say I disagree
http://www.macleans.ca/society/whats...ghomeshi-case/
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBen
When even the left wing imbeciles at the laughing stock Macleans can see an issue..... as usual though in our liberalized legal system the victim will be victimized again by the court and the media by the end of this. The media "leaks" about the women will continue and get worse I am betting and it is obvious he is an a** and abusive but I doubt he will be found guilty. He will probably be suing for wrongful dismissal within a few weeks after it is over if he wins too.
However what really ticks me off most is the for most part the media is quite complacent about sex trafficking, child prostitution etc. and yet 1 celebrity and perverted sex gets all this attention. We see child (Benjamin Levin), we young kids suffering assaults, women trafficked and no serious coverage, yet they waste hours and spend huge speculation on this perv. Just look, we can look at the recent Walid Chalhoub and his 48 charges and 10 young victims that didn't even warrant most news to even pay it attention and I will post the link to this slime for those that missed it.
http://www.therebel.media/muslim_mig...n_media_silent
Why would he sue again? He dropped the case against the CBC, and was ordered to pay costs, back in November 2014.Quote:
Originally Posted by mosquito
He is still facing another sexual assault allegation (related to his employment at CBC) and that trial is scheduled to start in June.
I didn't know they had split the trials up, trying to pay as little attention as possible. Never watched him while he was on TV, didn't want to watch his court "performance" either. I stand corrected.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wahoo
I would be a bit more interested in coverage of Walid Chalhoub or Benjamin Levin or the recent arrest of 22 on trafficking charges etc. Some CBC "entertainer" is of even less interest.
Once he gets this trial behind him he will have plenty of ammunition to sue the CBC for wrongful dismissal. This is far from over and he isn't done living on the taxpayer tab. Sunny days....
He could not sue the CBC for wrongful dismissal because he was unionized. The lawyer who filed the paperwork should have known that. His union has to fight to get his job back. If he is not happy with how it was handled by his union, then his only recourse is to sue the union.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wahoo
Completely false.Quote:
Originally Posted by terrym
The CBC has plenty of valid cause to have fired him, from the complaints filed in the workplace, to these violent sexual escapades. The fired other members of the Q team for covering up his a-holeness... They can certainly fire him for being the ahole.
He dropped the suit because he was told in no uncertain terms it was unwinnable.
Is this for certain? In many workplaces managers & up are NOT unionized.Quote:
Originally Posted by arclight
From what I've read, he was suing the CBC for defamation and breach of confidence. For some reason, he dropped that suit and filed the grievance with his Union for wrongful dismissal. My guess is that he KNEW he would NOT win the lawsuit and would be out a whole whack of cash as a result. Not to mention what he must be paying Henein in this criminal trial. His best odds are probably to try and have the Union negotiate him a severance package to disappear.Quote:
Originally Posted by arclight
And yes, his Union is not obligated to fight for him.