Originally Posted by
Gun Nut
Did you notice the phrase referring to the rifle does not state "a rifle capable of greater muzzle energy than 400 ft-lbs. I've been trying for sometime to have the MNRF change the regulation to insert the word 'capable' otherwise any firearm that you can load down to below 400 ft-lbs should be legal to carry. In using the 400 ft-lb criteria they were attempting to include all rim-fire rifles up to and including the 5 mm RRFM. However any person that reloads can easily load a 30-30 Win, 303 British, 308 Win, 30-06 Sprg, or even a 45 calibers down to under 400 ft-lbs. I have a cast bullet for a 32 caliber pistol, which I load in front of 6 grains of Unique which can be loaded for most .30 caliber firearms, which falls with the guideline. Failing that you can load a number 1 buckshot pellet in front of a simpler charge, and have some great small game shooting. I queried this regulation with one of the heads of enforcement for the MNRF, and when he sent the 400 ft-lb statement back to me, in his mind he inserted the word 'capable' in spite of the fact it is not there in print. He chooses to rely on industrial standard to eliminate firearms. However, when you reload ammunition there is no requirements that you adhere to industrial standards. So its a flawed piece of legislation that needs to be re-evaluated and amended. Another suggestion that would work is limit the use of firearms, that can be used for small game, during the open big game seasons, to rim-fire firearms only. This was apparently what they were attempting to do but they overlooked the versatility of center-fire firearms when it comes to people reloading. In my mind the way that the regulation is currently written could use a court challenge.
You don't stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut