Moderna ingredient list

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jakezilla

Anyone that doubts the relationship between COVID and economic policy needs to read this Forbes article from 2010. This isn't the first time it has been tried. The difference this time is the promotion of lockdowns that were sure to create an economic collapse. The economic collapse created by the lockdowns makes the attempt to implement a new economic policy much easier.

https://web.archive.org/web/20201011...l-fumento.html

From 2010

"In a September speech WHO Director-General Chan said "ministers of health" should take advantage of the "devastating impact" swine flu will have on poorer nations to get out the message that "changes in the functioning of the global economy" are needed to "distribute wealth on the basis of" values "like community, solidarity, equity and social justice." She further declared it should be used as a weapon against "international policies and systems that govern financial markets, economies, commerce, trade and foreign affairs."

Sound familiar?

---

Sorry but will it make any difference, if later you can claim 'see I was right'. ? You will be in the same boat as the rest of us non-believers. I think that many people would agree that goal you stated, they are trying to achieve, is admirable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

Sorry but will it make any difference, if later you can claim 'see I was right'. ? You will be in the same boat as the rest of us non-believers. I think that many people would agree that goal you stated, they are trying to achieve, is admirable.

---

It's not about being right...it's about bringing to light that this has been tried in the past and those in power will continue to try. If everyone wakes up to what is going on we can put a stop to it. I just want people to be aware.

Why don't you ask all the people who lost jobs and businesses from lockdowns how admirable that goal is. It's easy to talk the way you do when it doesn't cost you anything. Every socialist idea is a good idea to you as long as someone else makes the sacrifice.

Socialist/Marxist types never understand the amount of violence and suffering that will be required to bring in their utopia.

Does not everyone want a fairer world. Where a small minority of humanity on our planet have 90% of the good stuff, is unsustainable. Eventually the majority will revolt and take their share of the worlds resources. Humans should not throw food away in developed countries while most of the world does not have enough . Fix it or pay the price.

Right out out the Marxist Socialist play book:

Quote:

---

In Marxist theory, socialism refers to a specific stage of social and economic development that will displace capitalism, characterized by coordinated production, public or cooperative ownership of capital, diminishing class conflict and inequalities that spawn from such and the end of wage-labor

---

Ask Venezuela how that worked out for them ..HaHa..

And is it possible that while a person might see or feel a need for some things to change but this in not the people to lead, time, and or way to go about it?

Purportedly, the goal of the great reset is in part to make life a little better for the have nots.

And yet if we can’t see it with our eyes, the stats are clear. By and large the less fortunate are paying the prices, both with their health (ranked 65 at best 45 places worse than other G20 countries) and economically. Which for Canada, and being led by none other than JT and the the so called champions, and left..

Results speak for themselves

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

Does not everyone want a fairer world. Where a small minority of humanity on our planet have 90% of the good stuff, is unsustainable. Eventually the majority will revolt and take their share of the worlds resources. Humans should not throw food away in developed countries while most of the world does not have enough . Fix it or pay the price.

---

So what are you doing to solve this problem other than pointing it out from your supposed moral high ground? There are no laws saying you can't give away your wealth to make the world a better place. If you have a cottage or second home why don't you give it to a homeless family in need?

Wealthy people are not just people that have more than you, you are part of the wealthy.

Well do you want to give up part of your pension??? Say 50%. You go first

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

Does not everyone want a fairer world. Where a small minority of humanity on our planet have 90% of the good stuff, is unsustainable. Eventually the majority will revolt and take their share of the worlds resources. Humans should not throw food away in developed countries while most of the world does not have enough . Fix it or pay the price.

---

W

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greatwhite

Well do you want to give up part of your pension??? Say 50%. You go first

---

Sure thing. If everyone who earned, let’s say 150 grand a year gave back to the government, 50% of everything they made over that. You know just to be fair to the peons that we keep hearing about. 90% of government employees never make it onto the sunshine list.

Everyone who I know on the provincial pay roll made it on and everyone I know in the Federal would make it on quite easily.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

W

Sure thing. If everyone who earned, let’s say 150 grand a year gave back to the government, 50% of everything they made over that. You know just to be fair to the peons that we keep hearing about. 90% of government employees never make it onto the sunshine list.

---

Nope, my youngest son works for the federal government, and most who made the list are management. The ‘workers ‘ seldom. You know the ‘peons’. If everyone you know who works for government made the list, you travel in exceptional company. In the municipal LTC facility that I worked in only 3 management made the sunshine list out of over 200 employees.