The misinformation war is real

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

And vice versa if someone is not wearing a mask. It's entirely up to them in those places where it is not required.

Individual businesses may decide to maintain a mask requirement which is their right. Those who object to the requirement should take their business elsewhere without causing a scene or berating front-line staff. Same with restaurants that continue to require proof of immunization.

---

100% Agree

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by johnjyb

I believe that almost every person knows that a mask will stop something, it is a membrane that is porous and will stop most particles that are bigger then the holes/perforations in the mask. We use filters in our furnace and they stop the majority of dust from recirculating in the home, but not small things like bacteria or virus unless a HEPA style.
I equate these mask mandates to someone farting in a snowmobile suit or coveralls with longjohns underneath. You will still crop dust yourself and those around you, and as far as I know a fecal molecule or fart is a lot bigger then a virus molecule. So how well do you think that mask will do stopping the virus when it doesn't stop **** from going up your nose????
John

---

This argument will just never die

If you really think your getting up your nose from someone farting I won’t even begin to try to explain how wrong you are

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

And vice versa if someone is not wearing a mask. It's entirely up to them in those places where it is not required.

Individual businesses may decide to maintain a mask requirement which is their right. Those who object to the requirement should take their business elsewhere without causing a scene or berating front-line staff. Same with restaurants that continue to require proof of immunization.

---

Coming back to my original point
If restaurants choose to do so and you are in full support of such. Should they choose restrict access to other minorities, and those minorities take their money elsewhere without causing any fuss?

The hypocrisy of choosing one minority over the other seems to quite engrained in your reasoning
If society applies it should do so everyone equally

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by newbiehunter

Coming back to my original point
If restaurants choose to do so and you are in full support of such. Should they choose restrict access to other minorities, and those minorities take their money elsewhere without causing any fuss?

The hypocrisy of choosing one minority over the other seems to quite engrained in your reasoning
If society applies it do so everyone equally

---

Ontario law does not permit discrimination based on race. It does at present permit restaurants to continue asking for proof of immunization. Requiring a mask is little different than restaurants setting a specific dress standard. Patrons can make their own choices.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

Ontario law does not permit discrimination based on race. It does at present permit restaurants to continue asking for proof of immunization. Requiring a mask is little different than restaurants setting a specific dress standard. Patrons can make their own choices.

---

Agreed on legal part, which take my argument even further, so hypocrisy is engrained in the law itself [emoji846]
I am personally in support of banning discrimination at all levels, but requiring vaxx cert AFTER mandates have been dropped - is just insanity. Restaurants doing that should be at very least charged and sued under the same law

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by newbiehunter

Agreed on legal part, which take my argument even further, so hypocrisy is engrained in the law itself [emoji846]
I am personally in support of banning discrimination at all levels, but requiring vaxx cert AFTER mandates have been dropped - is just insanity. Restaurants doing that should be at very least charged and sued under the same law

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

---

So tell us how you feel about the no shirt-no shoes-no service policy?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by finsfurfeathers

So tell us how you feel about the no shirt-no shoes-no service policy?

---

There are 2 parts:
Mask retirements - equivalent of dress code and no shoes policy. That I am ok with.. It does not have any permanent effect on anyone

Vaxx pass requirement - this is that one I have a problem with

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

Are there actually restaurants or other places that are requiring proof of immunization? I've been to half a dozen restaurants since the restriction was lifted and not one was asked. Should it happen I'll politely decline, wish them a pleasant good evening and go elsewhere.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

Are there actually restaurants or other places that are requiring proof of immunization? I've been to half a dozen restaurants since the restriction was lifted and not one was asked. Should it happen I'll politely decline, wish them a pleasant good evening and go elsewhere.

---

"They're out there" https://www.rebelnews.com/why_are_so...ine_pass_alive

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by newbiehunter

There are 2 parts:
Mask retirements - equivalent of dress code and no shoes policy. That I am ok with.. It does not have any permanent effect on anyone

Vaxx pass requirement - this is that one I have a problem with

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

---

Now tell me how you feel about the establishment right to refuse service if they believe you are intox?
Or Smoking went from smoking every where to smoking/nonsmoking too only on patio too don't think you can smoke on permises?