Printable View
One could say the same after watching a whole year of lie after lie and being clearly protected in answering to those lies.Quote:
Originally Posted by DanO
The debate would be over if we're allowed to have an honest one.
Usually if you have to keep lying to protect your lies, you're either being paid or you're being played.
This nightmare needs to be woken up.
Exactly! Lied to by politicians and MSM for over a year now and people are awake. Peaceful demonstration rallies everywhere and they still try to hide it. The only way they know how to bring in their Global Reset. It can't any good for the people if they continually have to lie in order to implement it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-5F2twDSgk
So....there is little doubt that our village idiot has bumbled many things...BUT
are you (Impact & OneLess) suggesting that the Covid pandemic has been staged ?
The short answer would be, if the disruption or interference was as a result of a lawful act....like enforcing a law or regulation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Nut
So, the section you posted would not be applicable.
So in this case, the police were in a lawful position to act, in order to enforce COVID-19 restrictions, but chose not to?Quote:
Originally Posted by rick_iles
You don't stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut
100%. There's armies of lawyers building a case as we speak.Quote:
Originally Posted by 73hunter
When the evidence shows you deliberately hid how efficient therapeutics worked in preventing death's, you loose all credibility of your intentions.
The Nuremberg 2.0(covid) trials are coming and there's a shyteload of leaders on the list.
There is a question regarding if an EUA (emergency use authorization) for a vaccine can be issued if there are approved therapeutics. When you look into it, both sides get into the definitions of therapeutics and the word approved. It reminds me of the Bill Clinton trial and it depends on what the definition of "is" is
After looking into this you can see that there is an incentive for the pharmaceutical industry to suppress therapeutics like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin to facilitate the emergency rollout of the vaccines without proper clinical trials.
That was an issue that the Republicans bought forward under Trump. He handled it poorly and wasn't able to push the question forward. Especially treatment like Ivermectin..that was being used successful as a last resort in 3rd world countries.
Yes this was all about pushing the vaccines from Big Pharma.
Meanwhile an EUs Official for Vaccine procurement is trying to explain the 4 mil Eu ,which showed up on her /husbands account...............Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
Yes, to a degree. I’m sure they issued a warning, which apparently did no good. They found themselves in a lose, lose position, and using good discretion, backed out, Charges could always be laid at a later date, possibly with an Obstruct PO charge added in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Nut
IMHO....