AJ,you blew it. Nowhere can a "racist" comment be remotely construed from that post. Now,don't be a stubborn Liberal and apologize.
Printable View
You're confused. I'm not backpedaling.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
They don’t! That was not my intent. I would have said the same thing if the tables were turned and perspective jurors (regardless of race,creed or colour!) were overheard saying they were not going to rule in Bouchies favour!!! What’s the difference??? You tell me sir!
Welsh, like I said, you don’t know me. I have been a victim of racism during my lifetime. I am of German decent. The crap I dealt with growing up was ruthless! I can honestly say I would not wish it upon anyone. There is no room for it in today’s society.
These days it’s too easy to misconstrue what others say and call it racist and that is exactly what you have done. You sir are the one confused. Manipulating a conversation and hurling serious accusations as racist is inexcusable! Especially to try an win an argument in support of some stupid political ideology.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What I got from BTurks post was that he thinks a jury containing First Nations members could not provide a fair trial , but a jury of his peers (whites, farmers, middle aged men) could. That statement sounds racist to me! Even though he seems confused on who the perpetrator on trial is. A fair trial is not some stupid political ideology.
Some here don’t understand the meaning of “peers”....