16000 out of 32500000 equates to about 1 in 2000 or 0.05 percent. Over the counter aspirin comes in at 1 to 2 percent adverse. That makes the vaccine 20 to 40 times safer than aspirin.Quote:
Originally Posted by impact
Printable View
16000 out of 32500000 equates to about 1 in 2000 or 0.05 percent. Over the counter aspirin comes in at 1 to 2 percent adverse. That makes the vaccine 20 to 40 times safer than aspirin.Quote:
Originally Posted by impact
I like my odds better. 0% chance of the vaccine making me sick.
https://i.imgur.com/7qKurv3.png
So you are now one of the people who is causing the measles to make a come back, so sad.Quote:
Originally Posted by impact
That's your perogative. I guess that means you have never taken a prescription or over the counter meds for anything as they almost all have a higher adverse incident rate than the vaccine.Quote:
Originally Posted by impact
Even most herbal/homeopathic remedies have more adverse affects. I guess you must avoid those as well.
Assumptions on your part. I did get the seasonal flu vaccine last November. I also take prescription meds and daily vitamins.Quote:
Originally Posted by Species8472
No side effects on anything.
My goal is to enlighten people who then should question the vaccine project.
When I read statements involving government agencies like those two, red flags go up.
"We have strategic alliances with Merck on select commercial vaccines, and BARDA and DARPA on global health vaccine programs."
https://www.modernatx.com/modalities...mmuno-oncology
"0 percent chance of getting sick from the vaccine"Quote:
Originally Posted by impact
It is logical to assume if you apply a consistent standard to all medical treatments. They all have risks and most generate adverse affects more frequently than the vaccine.
It is inconsistent on your part to accept the higher risk of adverse affects from other treatments.
Like I said it's your perogative but than seems inconsistent to me if you accept other higher risk treatments especially when you state "0 percent chance."
I have a tendency to read the label before taking any kind of product.Quote:
Originally Posted by Species8472
So in that respect I am consistent.
Not liking the fine print on this one.
I'm a man of science.
Do you really trust the politicians with your health?
Impact were you vaccinated as a Kid and if you have kids did you get them vaccinated?
Have you ever looked at the data sheets?
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by impact
Perhaps instead of only settling for 0 percent risk you mean 0.05 percent risk outweighs any potential benefit.
Than applying risk/benefit analysis on a case by case basis you chose acceptable treatments which regardless of risks posed would allow you to be consistent.
The one problem, how do you apply a consistent standard to these vaccines as they have bypassed the safety standards and testing unlike all other medications? Why do you still have to wear a mask after you've been vaccinated, doesn't add up imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Species8472
Medicine thats been properly tested and approved, many people are more then willing to take. Many adverse side effects are already known through testing an approval.
These new vaccines have bypassed the standard for approval. Health Canada approved them instantly and the makers have zero liability for their product. Consumer's take at own risk.
I don't believe the whole country will be lining up to become part of an experiment, not myself anyways.