Yes, it is unusual to require a vaccine every 6 months for a non existent pandemic.
Comparing previous vaccines to a new mRNA jab with no long term data and plenty of side effects is a non starter.
Printable View
Yes, it is unusual to require a vaccine every 6 months for a non existent pandemic.
Comparing previous vaccines to a new mRNA jab with no long term data and plenty of side effects is a non starter.
All properly tested and approved...not an experimental drug only authorized for use in a health emergency...big difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Badenoch
Follow the money
https://www.ute.com/video/PLHKgZuwsHPq/
Replace ute with "bit and then chute" / one word to the correct uncensored link.
Says it all:
Attachment 42721
It used to take 4-5 yrs to normally bring a vaccine to approval, through many years of trials, etc. Since Pfizer decided the world population will be used to trail this vaccine, that meme is actually pretty close to reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushwhacker
Boosters every 6 months until they get enough data to finally get approval for it's use outside a 'health emergency'.
CONTROL, CONTROL, CONTROL...is the purpose and I have said it since day one.
More on the subject of booster shots.
https://rumble.com/vpmjvv-booster-shots.html
"Blame the under-vaccinated"...which is everybody without a booster. '..back to square one for Christmas.... :)Quote:
Originally Posted by impact
The Great Reset.......lolQuote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
I believe that in Jan 2022, we will be in full lockdown again...but open again by end Feb - due to media variant...just in time for election and warm weather kick off.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal