Originally Posted by
Gilroy
I would say the total wilderness and it would stand to reason this would be the case.
Logging has no doubt created many areas for the Moose to feed but they come with a heavy price?
Roads that are created allow for more predation by hunters using none traditional means to access a lot of territory that protected the Moose back in the day.
The same roads allow for four legged hunters to travel much more area in search of Moose.
Opening up areas by logging such as in Algonquin Park area and surrounding areas allowed for the northward expansion of Deer with the spread of Brain Worm killing of more Moose.
So I would go the for total wilderness area, they were renewed by much smaller natural forest fires caused by nature, so there has always been feed plots.
There is some talk that aboriginal peoples actually managed the land using fire for various reasons, this could have been one of them.
Truly wilderness areas in this Province where hunters had to go by traditional means without the logging roads, would in my opinion see a dramatic reduction in Moose harvest.
In a total wilderness state I believe even after smaller natural forest fires, more of the dense shelter areas would have been preserved.