Originally Posted by
krakadawn
Absolutely not....never have....have you worked for them?
A note of caution though might be in order though. You read such a weak report with no causal data what so ever, yet some are quick to jump on the bandwagon. My heavens those dogs could have died from a million other things rather than dog food???? Where they in a controlled environment, did they have access to rodenticides, how about glycol. What a lame statement from the Vet.
First of all it's a pathologists who determines cause of death and if it was a poison 90% of the time it's mineralization of the kidneys not the liver that shows clean.
The other note of caution requires the understanding of slander vs libel. While it's absolutely fine to express an opinion, putting statements in a published forum can put you at risk which is why I said ...."you got proof"
I have told you what a certain group(professional dog trainers) do, no one is expected or required to do as they do. These are a group of the most skilled people we have involved in competition where slight differences mean you go home or stay in the competition. I hope some people can see that there might be a wee bit of difference in their knowledge and skills since that is their livelihood.
YD, awhile back you sang the praises of a total raw diet, while I don't disagree with that diet if you are skilled to put it together, I see you're now totally convinced that quality kibble is the way to go. Is this the 'new' direction or will you be flipping back? An epiphany?
I actually welcome some valid discussion about dog foods, factual data welcome.