Originally Posted by
oaknut
Let me start by saying I in no way support the idea of impaired driving.
Our laws are plenty tight perhaps getting a little overboard. Penalties should be stiffer for sure. I think a redo of our impaired laws is in order. I do not believe someone getting nabbed at .081 should get the same treatment as someone nailed for .12 or the similar. I have no personal experience with a DUI due to the fact I'm always the DD but have a friend and an old co-worker who both got charged weeks apart.
Friend- slammed down a couple beer and a mickey of tequila, hopped in his truck and rear ended a parked vehicle. Thankfully nobody was injured. This guy spent 90 days without his licence along side a careless charge and he was back on the road.
Co-worker - Drank half a beer (was there to witness) phone rang, had to go pick up his son. Was pulled over for no seatbelt shortly after leaving the driveway, was asked to blow. He blew over. A quick ride to the cop shoppe saw him blow .08 and he still lost his licence for the year and had to use the unaffordable to him blow box for a while after.
How does this seem fair considering they both had the same Judge?