A Clumber Spaniel....... might as well as we will bring out every breed possible on this thread. Time for a popcorn and sit back and read!
Dick
Printable View
A Clumber Spaniel....... might as well as we will bring out every breed possible on this thread. Time for a popcorn and sit back and read!
Dick
I was in the same situation as you last year. I went with a Pudelpointer. I could not be happier. He passed his Natural Ability test at 5 1/2 months old. At 7 months he was retrieving ducks and steady to shot in the blind and canoe. He retrieved 6 geese all water and one still very much alive! Shot about ten grouse and twenty pheasants. Only one bird lost. He is not steady after shot in the field but steady in the blind. On the other hand he is full of life and a off leash run of at least an hour every day and another second walk on leash of an hour is required. He gets training every day. He is the best hunting buddy ever. His connection to me is unbelievable. Versatile hunting dogs are impressive if you put in the time. NAVHDA is key.
Consider a German wire-haired pointer or pudelpointer.
You clearly need a dog. :)
Re your question on springers and cats, I think it's going to come down not to breed but to whether the dog was raised with cats. But re the question of springers in general, if you think a pointing breed will be better than a Lab then you don't want a springer, you want to look at the European versatile breeds.
When I was looking for a new pup a few years ago, I attended the NAVHDA Invitational in Ohio. The event consists of three sections, field, double mark and blind retrieve. I was most impressed with the blind retrieve. It was a blind retrieve of approx. 90 yards across water. Straight across the pond, find the duck and straight back. I thought it was amazing. The double mark and field sections were very impressive as well. I would say that 60 to 70 % of the dogs were GSPs with pretty well all other versatile breeds represented, there was even a 8 year old Pointer which earned a VC that weekend. I choose a Brittany and am very happy with my choice. After a couple of years working with my dog, I am even more impressed with the dedication it takes to train to that level. I guess my point is that even though the Invitational dogs are the best of the best, you are only restricted by the type of weather and water temps you will be hunting if you have the time and dedication to train.
I am leaning towards a Brittany, the bush I would be hunting could be tough for strictly a flusher (too thick) and the longer hair would serve it better in the winter, plus they are smaller which would be fine for everything but geese (which we normally field hunt anyway). I pinged a few breeders to get an idea, no done deal yet but I miss having a dog around and I need to get moving on something or I never will.
We shall see what happens coming into the spring, lots of Brittany breeders that have been recommended in previous threads here, so that is a good selling point too.
Not many Brittanys can sit still in a blind, just be forewarned.
always the #1 on my list
but they are needy when it comes to how much time you have to spend with them if you want to actually max out their potential - so certainly not for everyone.
regarding the comment on being not able to retrieve a heavy goose. I would not attribute that to the breed, but rather to the individual dog not being conditioned to retrieve heavy game (e.g. goose, fox).