Banned gun owner wins a new trial

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rick_iles

You need to read it again. All guns were sold to the brother-in-law except “one high powered rifle,” The shop owner also said that had the gun been sold, he would have forwarded the money from the sale to Degraw.....further establishing him as the owner....

---

It will be interesting to see how the new case goes.

The news article says that he gave all the firearms to the brother in law. Why/if Degraw was listed as the seller by the shop then it was not correct.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Snowwalker

It will be interesting to see how the new case goes.

The news article says that he gave all the firearms to the brother in law. Why/if Degraw was listed as the seller by the shop then it was not correct.

---

Read it again......slower !! It clearly says all guns except one....the rifle that was at Rodney!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rick_iles

Read it again......slower !! It clearly says all guns except one....the rifle that was at Rodney!!!!!

---

The article says all guns were sold to the brother in law in 2007. Then goes on to say that all the guns but one was sold to a second buyer. The unsold gun was then transported to a shop in Rodney.

If all guns were sold to the brother in law who then arranged a sale to a second buyer, the brother in law should be the legal owner of the unsold gun.

For the store in Rodney to list Degraw as the owner would be incorrect.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Snowwalker

The article says all guns were sold to the brother in law in 2007. Then goes on to say that all the guns but one was sold to a second buyer. The unsold gun was then transported to a shop in Rodney.

If all guns were sold to the brother in law who then arranged a sale to a second buyer, the brother in law should be the legal owner of the unsold gun.

For the store in Rodney to list Degraw as the owner would be incorrect.

---

Comprehension is not your strong suit !! I give up !