Nice bit of deflection there Gilroy.
It isn't a system of you have to be for or against one or the other.
We can be concerned about the 2M persons who haven't signed the petition yet, AND highlight that a very popular charitable organization which purports itself to support hunting, and benefits greatly from firearms owning waterfowl hunters, isn't issuing a statement to its membership, nor falling down on the side of the law against it.
Argument from a position whereby one position depends on the other isn't an ideal position.