Bye Bye semi automatic rifles

"Disarmament is linked to sustainable development goal 16"

Aka agenda 2030 all connected to the WEF


People need to wake up if they think this is the way forward.

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

Guess it's a good thing for, over half the liberals cabinet stuck up the WEF backside.
OR
NOT
LOL
To stay on topic this is why your guns are being taken away. It was the plan it is the plan all fabricated from your unelected leaders put in place by our elected public officials.

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishfood

Simply put and on topic disarming the people is part of the agenda it's actually part of the 2030 agenda. And that is what Smith is trying to avert.

Smith is trying to help but if you can't see the bigger picture say goodbye to your guns. It's all part of the dirty plan. Smith is just standing up for you that's all.

Believe it it not but it's there.


Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

---

100% correct and an informed factual opinion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishfood

"Disarmament is linked to sustainable development goal 16"

Aka agenda 2030 all connected to the WEF


People need to wake up if they think this is the way forward.

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

---

Amen brother!

Couldn't use the quote feature , but am getting the subject back on topic and referring to some post above.

The amendment would ban " a firearm that is a rifle or shotgun, that is capable of discharging centre-fire ammunition in a semi automatic manner, and that is designed to accept a detachable cartridge magazine with a capacity of greater than five cartridges of the type for which the firearm was originally designed." MM

That's pretty much all hunting rifles and shotguns that aren't pump, bolt or lever-action.(This essentially would ban all forms of semi automatic firearms except for tube -style duck hunting shotguns.)

The 702 Plinkster 22 rimfire with military stock was banned but the other one was not. I guess if you put a military looking stock on a gun it becomes super powerful.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greatwhite

The 702 Plinkster 22 rimfire with military stock was banned but the other one was not. I guess if you put a military looking stock on a gun it becomes super powerful.

---

Is one more deadlier than the other? Yes or no?

If the answer is no then it's not about safety as they claim. It's about being betrayed as safety from the looks of a military stock.

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishfood

Is one more deadlier than the other? Yes or no?

If the answer is no then it's not about safety as they claim. It's about being betrayed as safety from the looks of a military stock.

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

---

Keep it quiet-;)someone may hear you,and then Good Bye to another model too...........:joker:

God know what they will ban next. They banned rocket launchers not a Liberal in existence seems to know that they were banned many years go.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greatwhite

God know what they will ban next. They banned rocket launchers not a Liberal in existence seems to know that they were banned many years go.

---

That's to bad I was going to use one next year on the deer hunt and save the butchering fee for all that ground venison.