How many people would not remove a piece of emission equipment on there car if they could, IF there gas mileage went up? Ya thought so.
Printable View
How many people would not remove a piece of emission equipment on there car if they could, IF there gas mileage went up? Ya thought so.
I think this may have opened a can of worms. How many other manufacturers of automobiles are playing this game?
they don't make a dent. ever got stuck on the 401 lately? urban planning (or the lack of it) is a serious issue and nobody will address this (especially not the tree huggers in California).
and if you look at government to make a real change, just look at those little buzzers: they are not allowed to have an muffler (even if the owner of a cert. general aircraft would like to) and have to use lead gasoline; for safety sake and to enforce the (outdated) rules
how did they actually find out about it?
internal whistle blower, competitor trying to copy it
It was an engineer at a Virginia university who was doing a study, and found it by accident I believe. Didn't read the article, but it may answer your question.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0RM2D720150923
Big trucks aren't exempt, and the emission equipment on them isn't cheap! I can't remember the model year cut in, but big trucks now require a DPF (Diesel Particulate Filter) that requires periodic servicing, and reduces fuel mileage. The also require a catalytic converter, and since they don't work the same as the one on your gasoline powered car, the also require a DEF (diesel exhaust fluid) system to inject a urea solution made with high-purity urea and distilled water. Because of the water content, they also require heaters to prevent it from freezing in the winter. None of these systems are cheap, that's the cost of clean(r) air.