I understand how someone less informed about the cycle and nature of the game population could assume that a natural predator could be the primary reason for such a drastic decline in the overall population of a specific species of animal. What you’re doing, however, is over-simplifying a complex and intricate cycle into a very basic process that places the responsibility of the decreasing numbers of an entire species on “human predators” and their inability to exterminate the hares natural predator (coyote). You’re saying that if we spent more time hunting coyote, and less time hunting the European hare, there wouldn’t be such a decline in population. So, in essence, what you’re saying is that we should focus our time and energy on exterminating the coyote population, so as to increase future populations of the European Hare?
We hunt maybe 6-8 times a season. In stark contrast, the coyote places consistent and relentless pressure on the hare (etc) population, as the hare makes up about 15-40% of the coyotes diet. Simple math and logic dictates that the number of Hare we hunt per season, has absolutely no effect and/or baring on the dwindling number of the European population. If you try to boil down a complex system, in effort to place the onus of the decrease of a population on one thing, all you’re doing is showing how little you know about such an interesting and complex ecosystem. According to your thought process, we should focus on exterminating more of the coyote species in order to ensure the survival of the European Hare population. So we should hunt MORE coyote? Got it ✅
IS THIS ENOUGH FOR YOU?....
Attachment 37982
Attachment 37983
Attachment 37984
Hahaha. I shot these 6 coyotes in one stand!!! From what I understand. Not too many shot 6 in one stand. Within 20 mins. So If you have any more intelligent insights you’d like to share with me or the rest of the forum, please let us know.