Victims have not even been laid to rest and the Liberals are moving ahead with this........unbelievalbe.
Printable View
I read the list is "hush hush" becasue they fear a run on those guns being bought up before the ban can be enacted.Quote:
CBC has not been able to confirm which models are on Blair's list or when these changes would be implemented.
This will be interesting.....I can't imagine it will take the scrutiny of logic :)Quote:
The RCMP confirmed Tuesday that at least one of the firearms used in the Nova Scotia shooting could be described as an "assault-style" firearm. The Firearms Act does not currently classify firearms as "military-style" — that term would have to be defined in the new regulations.
Hear hear !!Quote:
"No aspect of this unthinkable tragedy bears any connection to firearm regulations in Canada. Thus, the implied connection is purely political," he said.
The FAKE NEWS SITES ARE EASY TO FIND, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._news_websites
The Buffalo Chronicle is right there front and center,if you don' like this source there a dozens of other's sources on the internet saying its a fake news site.The right wing Toronto Sun makes no mention of allegation we are speaking of.
https://www.canadalandshow.com/the-b...-not-reliable/
He was not a party to the $2.25 million mutual non-disclosure non-disparagement agreement that she signed, in exchange for her continued silence, on the Wednesday evening of October 9th
[COLOR=#000000]“There was a ‘small settlement’ at the time,” he says, but declined to elaborate.
Even the not so bright on here should be able to figure out at least a year should be mentioned in a story, how do you go from a 2.25million non-disparagement agreement to "There was a "small settlement" and we do not know who said that?
FAKE NEWS CIRCULATED BY THE "NOT SO BRIGHT"
The author of that tripe is a CBC employee...(zero credibility)
https://www.cbc.ca/mediacentre/bio/justin-ling
It'll be interesting to see how well this all goes, they keep using the comparisons to the tough Gun laws in NZ and Australia...both political knee jerk actions. The forced bans and buybacks are a dismal failure, as they are largely unenforceable.
Quote:
Once again, responding to a horrendous crime by inflicting knee-jerk, authoritarian restrictions on innocent people proves to be an ineffective means of convincing people to obey. Specifically, New Zealand's government—which also stepped up censorship and domestic surveillance after bloody attacks on two Christchurch mosques earlier this year—is running into stiff resistance to new gun rules from firearms owners who are slow to surrender now-prohibited weapons and will probably never turn them in.
Officials should have seen it coming.
"Police are anticipating a number of people with banned firearms in their possession won't surrender them," Stuff reported at the end of May, based on internal government documents.
As of last week, only around 700 weapons had been turned over. There are an estimated 1.5 million guns—with an unknown number subject to the new prohibition on semiautomatic firearms—in the country overall.
Quote:
"In Australia it is estimated that only about 20% of all banned self-loading rifles have been given up to the authorities," wrote Franz Csaszar, professor of criminology at the University of Vienna, after Australia's 1996 compensated confiscation of firearms following a mass murder in Port Arthur, Tasmania. Csaszar put the number of illegally retained arms in Australia at between two and five million.
"Many members of the community still possess grey-market firearms because they did not surrender these during the 1996–97 gun buyback," the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission conceded in a 2016 report. "The Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission continues to conservatively estimate that there are more than 260,000 firearms in the illicit firearms market."