Guys, you’re never going to get Gilroy to admit that he secretly agrees with your point of view.
He was a cop, and cops are much smarter than he is pretending to be.
Printable View
Guys, you’re never going to get Gilroy to admit that he secretly agrees with your point of view.
He was a cop, and cops are much smarter than he is pretending to be.
[QUOTE=rick_iles;1111841]More great content from the armchair critic. LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Gilroy
When they go low we go high Michelle OBAMA.
Stop spoiling my fun, twelve years on here of watching the Conservatives chasing their tails its priceless.But honestly Justin and my old partner Billy Blair are on the right track and on the right side of history.The dinosaurs on here are a dying breed,grasping onto their guns in their cold dead hands........I mean Peter MacKay might open up the next election with a platform of "guns for everyone,open carry,AR 15s with every new bank account opened,but I kinda think it might be another wet dream. LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by 73hunter
Our pm is weak if he is willing to pull out a race card by a question related to dc tam.
Pathetic
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
You lost me at "Billy Blair are on the right track".......that boob could screw up a 1 car funeral.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilroy
Gilroy...you keep refusing to answer the question, in true form of a Liberal ...focus now...the question is simple ..Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilroy
Are you now asserting that LEGAL gun owners are the problem with illegal gun traffic.??
Why won't you answer it..WE would like to know ??
As I said a few pages ago, the forum members that are being “oppositional” are doing so for their own entertainment, not because they believe in what they’re saying.
Carry on if it fills the day,
Sad that there are those on here that are purposely contrary just to garner attention. It's called Trolling and we all know who they are. Some have been doing it for 12yrs and totally oblivious to the fact that they have lost all credibility.Quote:
Originally Posted by 73hunter
So this guy has no PAL or RPAL obtains firearms apparently mostly from across the border, because he can't obtain them here legally. Now the governments wants to go ahead with its assault weapon ban, which would not have prevented this from happening, so it will make the general public feel safer. I real have to wonder if you can't do anything that is going to make a difference, why they bother to do anything at all? Their motto must be : Better to be seen doing something, than doing nothing at all. . Now we the Canadian public can feel so much safer???
You don't stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
-Gun nut
They only list 4 situations that these bans would help Canadians . The last one says witch a gunman attempting to use???.
So they can only come up with 4 in the last 31 years. Its such a shame.
They talk about rapid fire I know guys who can put 5 to 7 shells through a shotgun on a flock of birds. And yes they only held 3 shots figure that out rapid fire.
What about turning a 30 30 into a semi automatic? It's been done . What does a ban do when you can change the way a firearm reacts?.
Then is all what happens over the border. What is used in the United states.
Didnt think an ar 15 was used heavily in Canada on mass murders. https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/politi...-1.4918623qqqq
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk