Curious.
Seems to be a pretty contentious issue. A wide and diverse range of options about things. Including what’s “right” or “wrong”
Oddly.
No tit for tat. Or flames. What’s missing
?
Printable View
Curious.
Seems to be a pretty contentious issue. A wide and diverse range of options about things. Including what’s “right” or “wrong”
Oddly.
No tit for tat. Or flames. What’s missing
?
It is only acceptable in the respect to the alternatives of banning, silencing and censoring .... a rude jerk sucks .... the alternative is a black hole crushing and killing.
Hence Judges idea of limiting the posts per thread or I would add per day in a thread sound good to me. The petty juvenile back and forth insults with no thought just intended to insult or annoy would be mostly eliminated putting a cap (per thread or per day) on the posts.
I am a moderator on another forum - mostly American; we average 200 member/guests per day. If there was going to be lots of political talk it would be there , considering how much American political turmoil there has been. However, we do not have an Off Topic section for politics. It does not appear in other threads either. The subjects are more narrow than here as it is ONLY about gundogs/hunting , but we find lots to say about the topic we love.
OOD is nothing like what it used to be. The Off topic section ( and members who are only here to talk about politics) has ruined it imo. I think that if you got rid of that section, there would be a time of transition , but we would get back to what we were- hunting/fishing etc..
The Charter of Rights and Freedom is not a consideration here. The people who own and operate this forum get to decide what is acceptable comment and what isn't. Those of us participating asked to be included and agreed to follow the rules. Either one abides by the rules or risks censure or being banned.