Printable View
Speaking of pedigree,I've never heard Chrysta freeland come out to denounce her maternal grandfather for being a Nazi collaborator during the second world War but hey that doesn't surprise me as liberals like to keep skeletons in the closet as much as possible. I'm sure if she was asked about it would be the typical liberal response deflect and defer and in no way directly answer the question because a liberal that can give a honest answer is nearly extinct.
T304 please try to stay on topic or start your own thread.
Is this a rule you are putting forward?
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishermccann
Isn't hijacking a thread not already a rule be it unwritten or otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhite
Back to Sloan....
Sloan first ran for the party in 2019. Sloan's homophobia, misogyny, bigotry and other extreme views would have been no secret nevertheless Andrew Scheer and his team let Sloan stand as a candidate. It is encouraging to have a new leader who won't tolerate Sloan or people like him.
This firing is political optics, the CPC took $13.00 from that fee, so they are just as guilty..but apparently blameless...
I have been telling you this for years - CPC/Libs are the wings of the same bird. You all have been trained to vote against something, or a pretty color. Frequently on the campaign trails, I would ask that question - great your voting XXXX - please tell me one policy of the party you are voting for...95% can't name a single policy of who they are voting for, and most just I have to rid of XXXX. Now is not the time to split the vote, vote have to stick together, maybe next time...45 yrs you have hoped/voted for promised change...
It is called identity politics for a reason - because it makes you a single issue voter, based on your demographics. Sadly, we are locked into this cycle and is exactly why O' Toole is doing this as plays to far left ideolog's and activists (two big demographics). This is the new norm and those who continued to swayed by these of actions - will continue to be swayed to vote for them.
If it was, which is isn't, he and his buddy would have been suspended years ago for repeated and multiple infractions.Quote:
Originally Posted by greatwhite
There is a rule however that one could say is in violation of rule'2:' as the intent of it by the poster was to be intentional provocative, considering the OP's well know political leanings.
just saying :)Quote:
: 2. Controversial, religious orwill be removed without warning.Quote:
political threads deemed inappropriate or needlessly provocative
Would -could,every political post be considered under that rule? From both political sides viewpoint, or just one?
Given how often some people will chirp about Harper/Cons whenever JT/Liberals do something.......................................Li ke being caught with a known terrorist while in India ( just saying). Talk about the pot calling the kettle black
It is refreshing to see someone get the boot, whether it's little more than optics ahead of a much speculated on 2021 election.
If you don't like how a thread is going you can always leave the thread. Is someone forcing you to participate?
Or have you chosen to participate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishermccann