Cottage country crackdown: MNRF stages enforcement blitz near Norland in City of Kawartha Lakes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by topher

Sure wildlife never inhabits 401 area either.... come on your stretching it now...


Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk

---

Actually you didn't gey my point also.
The 401/Hwy 35 comparision was used as an example of a back road compared to the 401 not in respect to where game inhabits.
The point I was getting at was an interior of a vehicle was not was meant to be an example of where game does not inhabit (limited to the interior of a vehicile) but far more broad in defination to include the larger surrounding area.
topher you have to take into account the previous posts and replies to define what was beening said.
To pick out one comment in a discussion will not accurately express the meaning in context to the whole conversation.

Given that the road check ran through the night I'd say the unsafe storage was really 'unencased' 1/2 hr after sunset or 1/2 hr before sunrise. Nothing to get really upset or concerned about.
Other than that the article suggested there were no charges directly related to poaching activities, ie; overlimits, out of season fish, improper tagging.
So to say there were so many charges on this road check, what did it really accomplish? They were all paper related.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MikePal

I remember a few yrs back when they set one up past North Bay pulling over the wagon trains heading north for opening day of Moose Hunting. They found over 64 ATVs without proper paperwork :)

---

I remember that spot check. All they wanted to see was the ownership for atv. They said they find a lot of stolen bikes that are taking north and the hunters leave them at their camps.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Foxx

I remember that spot check. All they wanted to see was the ownership for atv. They said they find a lot of stolen bikes that are taking north and the hunters leave them at their camps.

---

And if the person refused to show an ownership there would be no offense for not showing it.
Yes they could run the serial # to confirm if it's listed as stolen but no legal requirement to produce an ownership on an ATV if it's not being operated and in a truck bed or on a trailer. Possibally just running the ATV license plate could confirm that it is registered to the owner of the tow vehicle but nothing stops the vehicle owner from towing someone elses ATV short of it being stolen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Foxx

I remember that spot check. All they wanted to see was the ownership for atv. They said they find a lot of stolen bikes that are taking north and the hunters leave them at their camps.

---

Good policy for everybody is to check on any ATV they might get asked to tow,friend or no friend.That way you can say you already checked the ATV at a certain time and date.Of course if you know the unit might be a little hot you probably will not want to know in any case.But at least you did your due diligence and can escape answering a lot of awkward questions if your an honest person.

http://app.cpic-cipc.ca/English/search.cfm