Standing there gawking taking video is completely stupid but not the sign of some deep state conspiracy. When the shooting starts and you're in no position to stop it GTFO.Quote:
Originally Posted by onelessarrow
Printable View
Standing there gawking taking video is completely stupid but not the sign of some deep state conspiracy. When the shooting starts and you're in no position to stop it GTFO.Quote:
Originally Posted by onelessarrow
So, ignore that there's no sign of gunshot trauma, no panic in anyone's face and some clown who happens to be just narrating an active shooting and nobody is paying attention to him. Lmao.
Well I guess as long as your knowledge provider tells you to follow the script, you're good to go.
Just so you know, there are millions around the world as we speak that can't understand how the sheep won't wake the puck up.
Just saying!
Either way, we'll see you at the finish line.
How about Nova Scotia?Quote:
Originally Posted by Badenoch
The key word that I used twice in my post is "legally." The Nova Scotia shooter didn't just stroll into a gun store and buy an assault-style rifle. He had to have it smuggled in and then acquired the ammo illegally.Quote:
Originally Posted by gbk
Question,JoePa. Given the carnage of mass shootings,street murders and the current position on 2A that's become,quite clearly, completely untenable and defying all logic and common sense,at what point would you think Americans need to consider serious restrictions on firearm acquisition and ownership?Quote:
Originally Posted by JoePa
https://www.statista.com/statistics/...y-ethnicities/Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox
Almost identical
The second amendment isn't about firearm acquisition and ownership....it's about preventing tyranny.Quote:
Originally Posted by trimmer21
Which Americans expect to mean armed to the teeth. The 2A also says
A well regulated militia.
Not.
Lol I love how off track this has become [emoji23]
Serious restrictions on firearm acquisition and ownership? - only if the person is insane or a criminal with a record - only with the ability to have firearms can people protect their freedom - history has shown that the first thing any dictator or evil government -will do is confiscate guns and disarm the citizens - there are plenty of examples throughout history where the government enslaved its citizens because they didn't have the means to fight back - unfortunately that freedom has a price when someone uses a firearm to harm innocent people - I have in the past told of this incident - years ago at a local college a survivor of the holocaust gave a talk - after finishing he fielded questions from the audience - one individual ask him why the Jews didn't fight against the Nazis when they saw what was happening - the survivor's response - "with what they took all our guns" - our forefathers knew the value of citizens having the right to resist a evil government that's why we have the second amendment to our constitution - I think it is a God given right for one to be able to protect one's self and family from evil people - I feel so strong about this I would never give up that right - and remember one thing the first step to confiscation is registration - I hope that I answered your question - am a proud member of the NRAQuote:
Originally Posted by trimmer21