The misinformation war is real

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishfood

He wants to know who has their foot in the door at the WEF
With their agenda and opportunities should the public not be aware . This isn't the first time they have done this while asking other questions.

It's a reasonable question it would be nice to know the plans as well. . Can we ask questions the people want to know .


It's not a hard question lol



Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

---

We the people are in control of our democracy. We voted in the liberals under our democratic system. And when the next election comes, we will have another opportunity to democratically elect our officials.

Now, I wonder if that answer is enough.

ps. I thought this was obvious. That’s why I believe that the YouTube video was a demonstration of stirring the pot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Birdbuff

We the people are in control of our democracy. We voted in the liberals under our democratic system. And when the next election comes, we will have another opportunity to democratically elect our officials.

Now, I wonder if that answer is enough.

ps. I thought this was obvious. That’s why I believe that the YouTube video was a demonstration of stirring the pot.

---

Not enough offcourse.
It does not answer the actual question posed.

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by newbiehunter

Not enough offcourse.
It does not answer the actual question posed.

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

---

The question is based on a constituents assumption.

As a member of OFAH, are you birdbuff or anyone in your cabinet, swayed by the OFAH’s agenda?

This is how misinformation begins. Rumours and assumptions fester into conspiracies. Why? Doesn’t common sense dictate that the most simple answer is usually the most accurate. Boring is beautiful folks. Why are some people trying to conjure up an idea like that, if not meant to push division.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Birdbuff

How can you honestly answer a question that is so ridiculous in nature? You may as well ask if Bigfoot was an elected cabinet member. It is a fantasy driven question meant to stir the pot, nothing more.

---

Ridiculous? Ridiculous is ignoring the question. Millions of Canadians want to here the answer, why do you think that is fantasy driven? https://rumble.com/vvhegg-joe-rogan-...jDfyn7wTZhpUVU

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Birdbuff

How can you honestly answer a question that is so ridiculous in nature? You may as well ask if Bigfoot was an elected cabinet member. It is a fantasy driven question meant to stir the pot, nothing more.

---

Here is another with some more information

Just because they are the government it doesn't mean they can do whatever they want .

https://youtu.be/_KBkXitNHJM

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Birdbuff

The question is based on a constituents assumption.

As a member of OFAH, are you birdbuff or anyone in your cabinet, swayed by the OFAH’s agenda?

This is how misinformation begins. Rumours and assumptions fester into conspiracies. Why? Doesn’t common sense dictate that the most simple answer is usually the most accurate. Boring is beautiful folks. Why are some people trying to conjure up an idea like that, if not meant to push division.

---

The answer to should be:
Me birdbuff is or is not swayed by OFAH agenda.

Not: your question is stupid.

Simple enough, right ?

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by newbiehunter

The answer to should be:
Me birdbuff is or is not swayed by OFAH agenda.

Not: your question is stupid.

Simple enough, right ?

Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

---

That to me is the problem. I find the question so ridiculous as not to warrant a response. It’s built out of fantasy. It’s accusatory. It’s fundamentally opposed to the democratic belief of freedom of expression.

Maybe I’m off on this one, but it sounds to me like a witch hunt, and either answering or not would not satisfy the one posing the question.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Birdbuff

That to me is the problem. I find the question so ridiculous as not to warrant a response. It’s built out of fantasy. It’s accusatory. It’s fundamentally opposed to the democratic belief of freedom of expression.

Maybe I’m off on this one, but it sounds to me like a witch hunt, and either answering or not would not satisfy the one posing the question.

---

Sorry not clear what you mean by
"It’s fundamentally opposed to the democratic belief of freedom of expression" ?



Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by newbiehunter

Sorry not clear what you mean by
"It’s fundamentally opposed to the democratic belief of freedom of expression" ?



Sent from my moto g(8) power using Tapatalk

---

By accusing the pm and his cabinet of being under the influence or control of the wef is in direct opposition to the idea of these individuals having the ability to express themselves freely. Essentially the question accuses them of being puppets and not capable of acting on their own.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Birdbuff

By accusing the pm and his cabinet of being under the influence or control of the wef is in direct opposition to the idea of these individuals having the ability to express themselves freely. Essentially the question accuses them of being puppets and not capable of acting on their own.

---

Bye Jove, I think you've got it!