For sure optics but I can also see the mnr being concerned about coyotes being taken by less than legal means since there are prizes involved.
Printable View
For sure optics but I can also see the mnr being concerned about coyotes being taken by less than legal means since there are prizes involved.
Which is another law that I object to. Travelling with a loaded firearm in a vehicle is a reasonable law based on safety and the need to have a law in place to stop hunting from a vehicle. The encased firearm law is at odds with my natural survival instinct when I am in an area with bears or other large predators.
I agree with you observation, I am just not tickled with some of the laws as I believe many are not well stated and serve any real purpose.
Agreed
So the new category is best or most difference in weight of previous coyote. The rule would then state that even a second coyote taken with a 15 lb difference from the first would beat a total of say five coyote taken with only a 2 lb difference between each. This rule then puts the hunter into a scenario to hunt largest vs total. With this wording you can address the MNR response and still have a separate category to hunt. It may actually be better since there is an additional element to the hunt