Not sure that has anything to do with ethics. More to do with mainstream values. Sad though.
Printable View
Not sure that has anything to do with ethics. More to do with mainstream values. Sad though.
Sure it is a law made by ethics, but not the ethics of the people actually involved in hunting them, rather the ethics of the people in Victoria and Vancouver, their moral principles say that "Trophy hunting" should not exist, therefore the ban was put in place, nothing at all to do with sustainability, all to do with the ethics of the masses pushing their morals on the books.
Government doesnt regulate ethics...this is what you wrote...now your changing the wording?
As for my edumacation I have a 30k bachelors degree so I think my edumacational background is sufficient to debate grown up topics?....not sure why insulting my intelligence is relevant to prove your point unless perhaps your compensating for lack of real knowledge on the topic.
You on the other hand have no clear understanding on how or why laws are created. If you did, you wouldnt make such rediculous claims which you need to keep changing the story to stay relevant.
No law. This isnt letting game meat spoil because you never had the meat in your possession.
My opinion - If youve given every effort to find the animal and can not recover it, then go ahead and continue hunting. Youve done your honest duty as a hunter. if the first animal was anterless, then I might impose an antlers only rule going forward.