Gun ban talks back after a sad weekend in NS

While that all may be true JBen, and rather magnanimous of you, they indicate he has good reason to seek professional help. But his “Hail all that is Liberal’ schtick has got very tiresome. Not only does it violate the rules (stir the pots) his posts offer nothing to the forum and distract from otherwise constructive discussion.

I think collectively the forum is tired of his antics. Just read thru this thread and see how he is openly mocked and ridiculed. If those are the responses he's after, be they to turn his crank or for his entertainment , he has serious issues that need to be resolved before he can learn to play well with others.

Won’t get into that Mike. As I said, I won’t and cannot defend him. He’s brought it on himself.

I am only, speaking to the testosterone aspect.

Mikepal . . This " hail to the cons",stuff has gotten old and tiresome. See any difference except the #'s of people on the other side? . So someone says, 'conservative party is great', that is not stirring the pot, but if someone said, 'the liberal party is great' , that is? Why ? How foolish. Did not know that you had to be a member of the conservative party of Canada to be a member or have an opinion on this site. Someone having a different opinion, about a subject than you do , is not 'stirring the pot'. I will give an example. Mosq. has not said anything but anti liberal drivel for years, how is that not , stirring the pot', ? Like I said I guess it is okay if you agree with him, to those that don't...he is the one stirring the pot. If I go on the Montreal Canadians fan club site, and said Leafs are better, that is trolling. I should be able to go to the OOD site, and not have to agree with conservative policies espoused here, and not be called a troll because I do not agree with the majority. This is not a conservative fan club site.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishfood

Listening to press this morning was funny turd boy saiy all Canadians will be banned from these assault weapons as they are only meant kill people. Then the next speaker say expecte for first nations because the need them to hunt for food. Talk about being racist it's like they are not apart of Canada.

Funny tho it's ok for them to block trains and set the rail lines on fire. Throw rocks at the windows as the train goes by. No Canadians can use these weapons hey are ment to only designed to kill people. But they ok to use them .

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

---

If it wasn't for double standards the liberals would have no standards at all!

Coming from a conservative voter a message to liberal voters lol. This ban is not designed to save lives and protect the public from the gun violence they fear so much about.

This is a ban and a kick in the face to legal firearm owners. It was a ban in case they use these they are afraid of them because they COULD kill people fast NOT because they kill many in a short period of time.


Its called respect. Yes I know the streets well. I am a white man and have used the N word on the blacks . Oh yes I did ,oh my a white just just used the N word to black man.

Oh the looks of other white people around maybe they thought I was going to get killed or something. It was out of respect it's just a word I wasn't being selfish or racist. I yelled what up my Nig------ . I must be a racist for saying the forbidden black man word.


The liberal government should respect the gun users they are not the problem. How is there any respect when they ban the guns and let the indigenous people keep them hunting? Remember these guns are only designed to kill people. The government knows the indigenous people have issues yet they keep their guns in the field. Where is the respect to us Canadians. No respect at all.

Our government is childish and lazy to work on the real problems of what is happening they have no respect for law abiding citizens. If they did have respect for them they would work on the real problems.

But no pick on the law abiding citizens.

Not the way to stop the violence.....

Take the easy way out sounds like a great plan . Sorry but it's not going to be an easy route to stop this violence it needs to be worked on. Time and effort will pay off not just taking the easiest route there is that will save little lives and cost hundreds of millions.


Taking the fast route does not save lives. Also by taking the fastest and easiest route means he could care less if he not willing to take the time.

Feel sorry for anyone that has to give up there newly banned guns.

The liberal government has no respect at all.




Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

I should be able to go to the OOD site, and not have to agree with conservative policies espoused here, and not be called a troll because I do not agree with the majority. This is not a conservative fan club site.

---

It's used to hard for some of us understand how you guys couldn't figure out the difference between offering an alternation opinion and posting nonsence for the sole purpose of 'stiring the pot'....then you posted this:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

I have been winning so far, and just smart enough to know it. Sometimes the wife sees me smiling as I converse with you gentlemen, and asks why. I reply , ' I've really got them going today'.

---

To pretend to be offended by being labeled a Troll, when your doing what is the exact definition of what a Troll is rather ludicrous, is it not ? If you fight fires your a fireman..

Quote:

---

Basically, a social media troll is someone who purposely says something controversial in order to get a rise out of other users.

---

The admin (CalTek) got tired of it years ago and created a Political forum in the Off Topic area so guys like you and Gilroy would have a place where you can discuss politics. Try restricting your political debates there so we won't be subjected to that crap.

Just because you start fires, does not make you an arsonist.

When you act as a troll admit to being a troll then expect to be called a troll.
I have never in all my years on here seen you actually add anything meaningful, difficult to pretend you like guns yet want them banned.

I suspect many on here feel the same way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

Mikepal . . This " hail to the cons",stuff has gotten old and tiresome. See any difference except the #'s of people on the other side? . So someone says, 'conservative party is great', that is not stirring the pot, but if someone said, 'the liberal party is great' , that is? Why ? How foolish. Did not know that you had to be a member of the conservative party of Canada to be a member or have an opinion on this site. Someone having a different opinion, about a subject than you do , is not 'stirring the pot'. I will give an example. Mosq. has not said anything but anti liberal drivel for years, how is that not , stirring the pot', ? Like I said I guess it is okay if you agree with him, to those that don't...he is the one stirring the pot. If I go on the Montreal Canadians fan club site, and said Leafs are better, that is trolling. I should be able to go to the OOD site, and not have to agree with conservative policies espoused here, and not be called a troll because I do not agree with the majority. This is not a conservative fan club site.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

Just because you start fires, does not make you an arsonist.

---

That is where we disagree , many scholars think providing an alternative viewpoint is very valuable to a constructive discourse. As I have said before, I like guns, I have many guns. I hunt with guns. I do not want to see guns banned. Clear enough for you.

You can disagree when you actually add something constructive and you never have, As well you did agree with the fact you are a troll. Expect to be treated that way by many on here. As well anti firearms people generally will not be trusted by others on here. You pretty much behave as an anti firearms person.

Many will agree with me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

That is where we disagree , many scholars think providing an alternative viewpoint is very valuable to a constructive discourse. As I have said before, I like guns, I have many guns. I hunt with guns. I do not want to see guns banned. Clear enough for you.

---