Union's claim denied as arbitrator upholds mandatory vaccination policy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

There's nothing hard to understand. Anti-vaxxers have made their choice and now must accept the consequences. Those of us who have been vaccinated understood the risks, accepted them and are living a more normal life. Looking forward to joining twenty thousand or so of my vaccinated compatriots to watch the TiCats stomp the Argos and BMO Field. :)

---

It's funny how everything has turn into anti Vaxer's.

Even myself am up to date on tested and properly approved vaccinations. Just not this one so I must be an anti Vaxer right ?
I'm not against the vaccine but the mandates as many are .

We are not following the science.

How many got the shot not for the right reasons. ?
Just take everything away and threaten people with their jobs and say it's not being forced. What's the alternative ? oh yeah the y don't give you one.


I see over 300 adverse reactions in the latest report. On a side note there was under 100 serious. Possibly the new formula heck even Pfizer admits these kids shots didn't know the risks of myocarditis. Why will it take a few years ? We learned of the others right after did we not ?

What are the long term effects? That's what the people want to know and Pfizer won't give it because they are under staffed and over paid so it will take only 55 year's to to do a safety report.

People are blind and you are no better.

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

What do they say about first generation products. ? Lots of people get it anyway many wait to see the kinks and work them out.

Our tobacco company used to say it was safe

Our oil and gas companies used to say it it was safe

Lots of medical treatments were deemed as safe then they were pulled.


Those ads on tv when they asked if you took this you may be untitled to compensation once said it was safe.

Pfizer has just pulled another product off its shelves it claimed it was safe then people died.


What's wrong with waiting ?


Oh yeah because Pfizer has its big greasy paws in the Proffitt jar lol.

People should realize that the big producers always will push the safe thing for a buck.

This is an emergency use only vaccine and approval. How safe can it be when was was aloud to Skip standard procedures.

Is relatively safe and safe the same thing ?

As I said before it's pretty irresponsible of people to be forced into taking an emergency use only vaccine.

Yes people are being forced into it.



Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

This family from Quebec a former RCMP moved to Mexico to avoid the mandates. https://www-cbc-ca.cdn.ampproject.or...port-1.6271669

This happening all over doctors from New York are moving to Texas to avoid the shot .


Heck I planned on working the next 20 years lets see how this plays out it could be an early retirement lol. Let's see the safety reports then I will make a decision on what I put into my body.



Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Here is a mandate bust

Shows just how easily the fully vaccinated are getting sick.
A restaurant out break imagine that lol.

They did everything they could and yet they try and blame it on maybe the unvaccinated with a fake pass.

So much for mandates lol.

https://youtu.be/jydZ1dp43QE

Yet I was aloud to eat in a restaurant last year and it was deemed safe hehe .



Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

It's optional for grocery stores and malls. Food delivery services and curbside pick up are quite available across Canada including New Brunswick. No one is going to starve.

---

To suggest people can just order food online or pick it up elsewhere is to gaslight and minimize how serious this infringement is on a very basic level.

In addition, not everyone has the internet, a phone, an address, a vehicle or even a credit card.

Sick and twisted to ban anyone -- even your worst enemy -- from access to food.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bushwhacker

To suggest people can just order food online or pick it up elsewhere is to gaslight and minimize how serious this infringement is on a very basic level.

In addition, not everyone has the internet, a phone, an address, a vehicle or even a credit card.

Sick and twisted to ban anyone -- even your worst enemy -- from access to food.

---

If they don't have a car how would they get to the grocery store in the first place?

No grocery store in NB has actually done this. The government has simply given the option to those stores who do prefer not to have anti-vaxxers on their premises. Should a store decide to invoke the regulation anti-vaxxers can shop somewhere else or pick up their groceries on the sidewalk.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

No grocery store in NB has actually done this.

---

Because it's illegal...

The Human Rights Code is not law - it was designed by socialists, controlled by socialists, and sides with the states illegal mandates. So the ruling was based on a code and NOT applicable in LAW. Did you expect anything else? I didn't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MikePal

Because it's illegal...

---

To clarify...because grocery stores were deemed to be essential services.

So I know of a nursing home in Ottawa in which all residents have received the 3rd dose over a month ago. - Today they are under COVID outbreak.

The JAB does not work to protect you from Transmission or Contracting the flu virus.