Quote:
Originally Posted by
rick_iles
Once again.....it says "use or carry"....on your person or vehicle or boat....dissected, it says, use a gun, or carry it physically or in your truck or boat WHILE hunting for deer, moose or bear....a gun stored in your truck, encased, is neither used or carried !
That paragraph simply says, if you are hunting bears and deer and moose at the same time, you have to use or carry a firearm that is legal for moose and deer. It says nothing about storing a gun in your truck...
This might just be nitpicking but just to be clear, with regards to the Firearms Act, a firearm left in an unattended vehicle is not considered to be in storage. It is considered to be in transportation.
Quote:
Regulations 10(2), 11(d), 12(e), and 14(2) all speak of "transportation" in "an unattended vehicle."
Obviously, that terminology means that a firearm in a vehicle does not come under the "storage" regulations simply because the vehicle is not moving and is "unattended." It still comes under the "transportation" regulations -- no matter how long it has been sitting there.
There is no point in time set in the law when that situation shifts from "transportation" to "storage." Therefore, at any time, the accused could well be convinced that he is in perfect compliance with the "transportation" regulations, and that that is all that is required of him. He then lacks mens rea, the "guilty mind."
Therefore, when the Crown charges that "storage" in a vehicle contravenes one of the "storage" regulations, the Crown has laid the wrong charge. The accused has not committed that offence. He is innocent of that charge.
There might be a feeling that a firearm "in an unattended vehicle" becomes a "stored" firearm at some point in time. That can be fought by pointing out that the accused reasonably concluded that the Regulations did authorize him to do what he did, and can be read in that way by a reasonable person. Therefore, under the rule of statutory interpretation that the statute must always be read in the way most favorable to the accused, the accused is innocent.
As well, the accused -- by thinking that he is in perfect compliance with one Regulation -- is innocent of violating another, by virtue of his lack of mens rea.