And I queried the MNRF as a result of this thread, and their response today contradicts that given to GW11. Take what you will from this, I'm not into debating it. Posted for information purposes only.
Referring page: page/ministry-natural-resources-and-forestry
Message:
Hello. I am writing to ask you to clear up a topic of uncertainty regarding the use of hunter orange. If I am wearing the appropriate amount of hunter orange (400 sq. in.) when legally required to do so, but then wear a backpack that is NOT hunter orange over top of my jacket or vest thereby rendering some of it not visible, am I in violation of the law?
Reply Request: Yes
Name: smallgamer
E-mail:
[email protected]
Phone number: 519-xxx-xxxx
Hello smallgamer:
Thank you for your inquiry.
Yes, it would be illegal to carry a non-hunter orange backpack on your back. By putting a non-hunter orange backpack on your back, you are now illegal because your hunter orange garment is now less than 400 square inches above the waist and visible from all sides.
In the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, it states the holder of a hunting or trapping licence shall wear a garment in hunter orange and a head cover in hunter orange while hunting wildlife. The hunter orange garment must be solid and not open mesh clothing with a minimum total area of not less than 400 square inches above the waist and visible from all sides.