UN reveals goals of Trudeau's 'Great Reset'

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by line052

Exactly - those that are at risk..stay home, order in. Open up the 99.7% who are not afraid and need to earn a living.

---

But then how would they get the small businesses to close, people dependent on the gov't for more and more ... I mean the timeline for the WEF only has just over 9 years left until the start of 2030. If you can get 40% of the population in Canada on your side that is a majority government, with huge immigration, payouts, payoffs to radicals once you get that 40% you can start pushing through even more, imagine if the Liberal's were a majority instead of the minority.

We know they are seizing thousands of personal possessions from people in the name of public safety, lying about it and using the taxpayers money to buy items that people generally don't want to sell. Blair/Trudeau etc. have lied enough about the reason they put the firearm ban in place, even though they knew it was false that it is ridiculous.

Inviting Chinese PLA soldiers to train in Canada, admiring dictators and tyrants and disdain for vets... and lies... it was Justlied Trudeau himself that stood up before the first election and over and over repeated we shouldn't be fighting the vets and the situation is far worse now than then!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishfood

Well we need to shut everything down

Small businesses are only accountable for 1 percent of positive case's.

Why isn't shutdowns working like I said ?

It's that time it's going to spread no matter what we do . China are dealing with a few cases a day most of the ones they are finding has been by traveling.

14 days thats it lol.


No point in half a ss ING
Like we have done The entire time only the top 1 percent is laughing all the way to the banks.

York region has pled to stay open but unfortunately we are listening to a Dr that only says was he told to say. Even the hospital organization said not to close down.

1 percent of cases the small businesses that are closed .


Toronto's top health doctor who ordered the BBQ closure, don't understand why the case's have risen she said it worked the first time.

Wow I didn't need a PhD to tell her that lol.

Schooling can't fix stupid hahaha

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

---

Well... what is the purpose, is it what the "experts" say, was it actually the doctor that had a real reason or...
... this hot mic ..... fills you with such trust for what the Health officials say... NOT!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckVC...ature=emb_logo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

JB . I don’t expect anyone to sacrifice for me. I did not pick their lot in life. I know full well in my line of work that life is not fair. How about we ask all the companies for whatever extra profit they might have made over last years numbers and we give that money to those business that they took the profits from? Instead of the shareholders and bonuses for the board?

---

My wife's cousin was in a long-term care home . She quit 2 years ago because she couldn't handle it.



I was thinking about the big companies giving back too the other day lol.

Cheap gas 35 cents a liter lol. Cars and trucks only no jerry cans for xmas haha gas seem to have jumped the last week

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

One last thing G.

Why do expect bigger companies to step up, but no one else?
Anyone “but me”?

Should they? I said that didn’t I? And again, moan all you want about corporate profits. I think we’ve covered that some to. Do you like your indexed to inflation pension? Which if we kneecapped 50 years of corporate profits, would only be worth maybe 10% of what it is today? In other words, you would be drowning right with all those other people.....

We are ok with sacrificing, and doing virtually nothing for.

Why keep only big business open when it does the worst outcome .

What is the main thing to do and most efficient way to curb the spread?

Simple you keep people away but now they just funneling everyone to certain stores.

Instead of more open and less crowded they have done the exact opposite. And what places are seeing these cases increase? The same please they are funneling everyone to.

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JBen

One last thing G.

Why do expect bigger companies to step up, but no one else?
Anyone “but me”?

Should they? I said that didn’t I? And again, moan all you want about corporate profits. I think we’ve covered that some to. Do you like your indexed to inflation pension? Which if we kneecapped 50 years of corporate profits, would only be worth maybe 10% of what it is today? In other words, you would be drowning right with all those other people.....

We are ok with sacrificing, and doing virtually nothing for.

---

How did I get involved here?

Haha
G for Gord.

When I can I prefer real names/initials.

It’s a respect thing

How come when a company takes advantage of a situation it is called capitalism but if an individual does it, greedy he is.

You asking me?
I surely hope not because my record on that stuff....

Good deflection though all the same.
Maybe Im wrong on this but did you not sometime in the last couple weeks talking about a good buying opportunity to buy a country house/cottage, knock it down and.....Take advantage of not only someone else's misery because they've been forced to sell, but also the fact you aren't willing in the slightest to help them out?

Fear and Greed, like taxes and death. About the only two things in this world I ever count on.
;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JBen

You asking me?
I surely hope not because my record on that stuff....

Good deflection though all the same.
Maybe Im wrong on this but did you not sometime in the last couple weeks talking about a good buying opportunity to buy a country house/cottage, knock it down and.....Take advantage of not only someone else's misery because they've been forced to sell, but also the fact you aren't willing in the slightest to help them out?

Fear and Greed, like taxes and death. About the only two things in this world I ever count on.
;)

---

Not that I agree but would this not be the Capitalists' way....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MikePal

It's not so much a lie as how they are manipulating the data to instil fear...like the positivty number. When they were testing everyone the number was at 1.4%....well that wasn't scary. So they switched to only test people with symptoms. The postivity rate jumped to 5% and they tacked that onto the numbers to show there was a 2nd wave. They been fudging the numbers like that since the beginning.

---

We are at the mercy of the "spin doctors" or AKA "operator error"
This is confirmed by a bulletin from the WHO
One should insist upon receiving a positive test with or without covid symptoms that the lab supplies data such as cycle time.
I am of the opinion that in their rush to test everyone the manual lab protocols are not being followed and the data is skewed.


"Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result. The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain. Thus, the IFU will state how to interpret specimens at or near the limit for PCR positivity. In some cases, the IFU will state that the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise."

https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-...l-ayPS8XM7jcNA