Rittenhouse trial

Sorry Mosquito,

This kid was out of his area, defending nothing he owned and sticking his nose in where it did not belong. Long and short of it he has regretted every minute of it according to his lawyer, would never do the same thing again and has probably learned a very hard life lesson.
Unfortunately other people lost their lives, but he has to because he will never be the same again and probably has years of civil trials ahead.

This tragic story should be put to rest.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilroy

Well if your so keen on all this lets just arm all the kids here with AR 15, what a brilliant solution and have them go at it.

Oh yeh I forgot you guys tried that in the last two general elections and it cost you the election's and you couldn't even get a leader who had the stomach to back up his own promises. Well that's the bad new for you.

The good news is that our leader, the very Honorable Prime Minister of Canada JUSTIN TRUDEAU kept his promises on these guns and handily one the last election and even gained more seats. Thank goodness your avatar shows his beautiful smiling face I just don't know why Billy is not the picture with him and you have that stupid looking cowboy.

---

Your forgetting that it's just a gun ,yep that's all it is.

Pretty sad here in Canada they need to use a 30 year old case to push the fear of a gun.

You know the ar 15 that has done little to no damage amongst us. A gun so scary pets kill more often than the gun itself in Canada.



Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

Both are products of American society. The difference is one is alive and the other was murdered by police officers.

---

Go back to what started it all
Convenience store called in black man passed fake $20 bill. Black man didn’t comply with police

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mosquito

Boy, you just can't get it right... let's correct.

White male while protecting property and people assaulted by 3 criminals (child rapist, felon armed with a handgun...) ended up defending himself, the media then lied and verbally and legally assaulted by those with an agenda and disdain for facts.

Sad day in Canada, we see those that stand up lied and facts distorted in fear of people that stand up for what is right and defend themselves instead of being beaten and possibly killed by criminals.



The evidence shows you got facts wrong again.

---

So Kyle knew all this before he shot them? While protect property that wasn’t his? Oh that makes it all ok then.

End of the day, he was found not guilty. Doesn’t bother me. But judging by the discussion here some members seem to long for the opportunity to do the same thing here. That is ridiculous. If you want to play judge, jury and executioner feel free to head south of the border. Or wait until you finally get “your guy” is elected and give it a try.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by js4fn

Go back to what started it all
Convenience store called in black man passed fake $20 bill. Black man didn’t comply with police

---

Yep, and they have lied about him dying (he's just pea bargained) witht ANTIFA and BLM using it as an excuse to burn and destroy, tens of millions of dollars in damage, hence the reason Rittenhouse was out to protect from the riots. Then they attacked him, he tried running away, they chased and attacked him more and some ended up shot. They will use it again for more destruction it seems

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cameracutter

So Kyle knew all this before he shot them? While protect property that wasn’t his? Oh that makes it all ok then.

End of the day, he was found not guilty. Doesn’t bother me. But judging by the discussion here some members seem to long for the opportunity to do the same thing here. That is ridiculous. If you want to play judge, jury and executioner feel free to head south of the border. Or wait until you finally get “your guy” is elected and give it a try.

---

No dippy, he defended himself from attackers... you really hate facts or just the fact someone defended themselves instead of just getting beaten, robbed atleast and maybe killed. Protecting themselves and their family... yeah most with a backbone and integrity on here would... the Libs probably just curl up in a corner, pee themselves, that's the Lib advice to women instead of pepper spray etc.. Any straw to avoid the facts, how sad, I hope your mental condition is better one day.

I don't need to be judge and jury... they already threw out the invalid charges and found him innocent. We need to get "our guy" elected, the liar we have in power in Canada is terrible, lies, corruption, doubling the deficit, used jets, money to terrorists, division etc... disgusting!

"Wilson-Raybould says she's mad at herself now for having once thought Trudeau is an 'honest and good person, when, in truth, he would so casually lie to the public' "

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilroy

What right was this kid defending exactly. The right to run around like a big man with an AR15, a scrawny 17 year old punching way beyond his weight class.

---

In WWII 17 year old kids by the thousands falsified paperwork in order to join various branches of the military and defend our freedom against tyranny. They simply saw the danger and stepped up to defend democracy.

History has a tendency of repeating itself and we are now sitting on a powder keg worldwide.
People of all ages are fed up with the woke cattle manure and are stepping up to reclaim what is rightfully theirs peacefully but will defend themselves against anarchists. Surprised?

The leftist are now in damage control trying to prevent this Great Awakening.

Ironic that every year we pay homage to the same class of 17 year olds at Remembrance day ceremonies who fought for the freedom we enjoyed. They are the last remaining survivors of the horrors that descended on this planet.

Lest We Forget......

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...8ad18c035a.jpg

I feel like this thread lacks a level of useless memes. You know, ones that make you role your eyes.

oh wait. Never mind. Job done.

With all the strong opinions in this thread ,there is one thing NOT answered yet:
WHY many here ,who vehemently oppose the Rittenhouse verdict, think that those 3 unlucky people, who got shot -HAD the right to attack the kid? With intention to do serious damage to the fleeing man-up to and including killing him?

What makes their attack OK and not questionable?


Please help me understand this .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gbk

With all the strong opinions in this thread ,there is one thing NOT answered yet:
WHY many here ,who vehemently oppose the Rittenhouse verdict, think that those 3 unlucky people, who got shot -HAD the right to attack the kid? With intention to do serious damage to the fleeing man-up to and including killing him?

What makes their attack OK and not questionable?

---

Same group that never saw anything wrong with Antifa burning down a city block in the name of anti-racism. Misplaced allegiances.