Presumably you have data to support your claim, and are not simply making an ideological statement based on selective evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by last5oh_302
Printable View
Presumably you have data to support your claim, and are not simply making an ideological statement based on selective evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by last5oh_302
Nope, ideological based on selective evidence. If you can't beat them, join them.Quote:
Originally Posted by welsh
So sad . :(
Yup just like..... guns don't kill people,........ would it be, dogs attack stoned people, or, stoned dogs attack people, or, stoned dogs attack stoned people?...And, since when is threatening ( I am going to give you bath, I am going to take you to the pound), or yelling at your dog abuse? LOL.
It's like those Mom's that refuse to accept their kid is a chithead as the bailiffs take him off to prison..."he's just misunderstood"... HaHa.
Thing is a gun won't break out of your vault and maim or kill a dog or person. Many Pitt attacks are escaped family dogs who snap.
Considering Ontario has a Pitbull ban in effect, it sure is easy to buy one.
http://www.hoobly.com/6360/1689/10/
The pitbull ban is just another useless unenforcable piece of "feel-good" legislation. I see people walking them all over the place,all the time. I've spoken with folks and they all say "Oh,this is a cross with (enter ficticious breed here) so,it's OK." Meanwhile,the dog is acting aggressively. Dumb people,just simply dumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by last5oh_302
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishermccann
So when the same liberals that banned pit bulls ban semi-auto firearms is everybody going to be ok with it ?Quote:
Originally Posted by terrym
Bad, ineffective legislation is always the wrong solution.
If someone owns a pit bull and makes it into a vicious dog and it attacks someone then do the hard work and investigate and charge them.
The same for firearms. There are sufficient laws on the books now to prosecute gun crimes but liberal judges keep giving out slaps on the wrists.
Legislation is not always the answer to our problems.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Some people should not have dogs, and some people should not have guns, it is not a right. Maybe investigate first, before trouble starts. Some would say it is none of the governments business and then complain when unqualified people access the things they should not. Write a test for a possibly deadly gun, write a test for a possibly deadly dog. And no you can't stop people from having a possibly deadly offspring, no test needed there.