Originally Posted by
Bluebulldog
Pretty much what Trimmer has stated.
A question was asked. It was answered from an incorrect position by some.
While some behaviors are contemptible, saying that they are illegal, or implying they are by stating "good luck explaining that to an LEO" is false, and has been called out.
What I have been stating all along, is that landowners ( and I am one) are quick to point out where the TPA needs to be addressed, yet some forget that it wasn't written with the FWCA in mind.
The OP was referencing a bush parcel up North, either owned by IO, or OPG, but doesn't meet the criteria as stated under the act.