Darwin’s theory at its best . Who in their right mind would chase anyone armed with a rifle????
Printable View
Darwin’s theory at its best . Who in their right mind would chase anyone armed with a rifle????
I've said it it here before, but I don't know why you guys keep responding to those trolls, it's a total waste of time that accomplishes nothing other than feed their frail egos. No matter how much you post the truth it will make no difference to them as their only purpose is to disrupt these threads, regardless of the topic. Just ignore them, they'll slither away once they don't get reactions anymore.
[QUOTE=gbk;1180213]With all the strong opinions in this thread ,there is one thing NOT answered yet:
WHY many here ,who vehemently oppose the Rittenhouse verdict, think that those 3 unlucky people, who got shot -HAD the right to attack the kid? With intention to do serious damage to the fleeing man-up to and including killing him?
What makes their attack OK and not questionable?
Please help me understand this .
Well I for one made no mention of vehemently opposing the Rittenhouse verdict. This kid placed himself in harm's way because he was armed and felt emboldened to act as a Cop. He could have well got himself shot and the shooter used the same defense?
The most guilty parties here are as Joe indicates Police officers not carrying out their functions they are being paid to do now they have more vigilantes weekend warriors running around as if they didn't have enough already down there.
LMAO, if those last 6 posts are related to my last one then I guess you still haven't figured out that you're all on my ignore list so I don't see or look at any of your posts. You're not worth wasting my time on, that's for sure.