Originally Posted by
jobbershunting
I am on the fence on this topic. I understand that there is a market for a waterfowl guiding service because there are those who may only get out for one or two hunts a year and if I was that person I would look for a guided hunt too.
On the other hand, I can completely understand why the recreational hunter has such a dislike for guiding operations. The amount of pressure that a guiding service can put on birds in your area is remarkable, especially if they are highly successful and are taking clients out on a daily basis.
I my area (SE Ont.) we have several guiding services and more seem to pop up each year, imagine having 4 or 5 guiding operations running within your WMU, assume each one is taking out 4 clients four times a week (4x4x4 multiplied by the expected bag limit = 384 geese/week or just shy of 1,600 geese/month for your MWU and that is using conservative math.
Couple that with "opportunity", the recreational hunter more than likely only gets out on the weekend, which also happens to be the busiest time of the week for guiding operations. One is being motivated by money and the obligation to 'perform' to secure a field and produce a good hunt, while the other is motivated by their passion for the sport. Is there no better recipe for conflict?
Lastly, there was an excellent article in the Delta Waterfowl magazine a year or two ago talking about the observed shifts in migration routes either along the upper Mississippi Flyway or Lake Michigan area and the correlation to hunting pressure, more specifically guiding operations. The author was suggesting that traditional waterfowling hotspots are more susceptible than we think to 'burnout' from hunting pressure that can be applied by a high density of guiding operations. I'll continue to look for the article and will post it if I find it.