I'm not saying you did anything wrong. I merely interpreted what SeanL was saying.
Not that I can recall you ever complaining about natives and treaty rights but I guess you will abstain from that rhetoric.
Printable View
Careful .... you just admitted you're going to harvest a struggling moose population even though the MNR is cutting the harvest for most Canadians. Just because you are allowed to harvest doesn't make it right. How can you criticize the Jeff for taking 5 legally tagged moose last year (before the situation was so dire)?
First off I think we should get over the fact that Jeff got 5 moose in one year and ask the more important question HOW?? Dam I am looking for pointers on this one as our sucess rate is nowhere near that.
As for the natives in 48, I believe they are the only organized band accross ontario that actually has an agreement in place wiht government and has the band enforce the hunt accordingly.
Donnie
LOL, that's funny. I can't take all the credit. One of our group members was responsible for finding the spot before I ever came along and out of the past 10 moose shot I only shot 2 of them. Regarding our good results, that is something we keep amongst us. Totally legal but not something many guys do.... Sorry for the last statement as I am usually more then willing to share, just not in this case...
You right, I probably could have worded that better, but it does not change the facts. Whether I am hunting or not when most others are banned, many will. Additionally, the moose are obviously struggling right now and I would bet that most moose hunters will still go out this year. Lastly, it is inconceivable to me that anyone who spends as much time in the woods as Jeff does would really have thought the situation got so dire so fast. This has been building for years, as anyone who has watched tag numbers for the last 20 years should already know. The "I didn't know it was so bad" attitude is useful as an excuse to continue poor practices everywhere, but not good for much else.
Jeff I'm jelly!!
I cringe at the thought of all the work that has to be done when were onto moose #2, at # 3 I start claiming that I have back problems, could've shot #4 and 5 one year but "I" decided that it was way to much work, "but" I had the riot act read to me when I told my crew as they have the same adage as Jeff..."MNR gave out the tags, we have em why not fill them if we can!!!|"
SO I support Jeff and his groups decision to fill the tags....
But moving forward things do change for all moose hunters in this province. at first change is hard to swallow then the benefits of said change will be to our liking
I think this is just the beginning. I would not be surprised if the hunt is cancelled in the future as it has been in Minnesota which is not too far away from the severely impacted WMUs !!!
I'm one of the guys that hunt in WMU 28, which just saw a 93% reduction in tags, from 457 to 30. I'm scratching my head, as are a lot of guys I talked to, as to the methodology used. We filled our tags last fall, saw no shortage of animal sign, and were visited by a C.O. who told us other camps in the immediate area were successful as well. To get to the point where we are now, either their calculations are seriously flawed, or they have grossly mismanaged the area for several years.