Forcing people to work in a certain area........ sounds like communism to me.
Printable View
Forcing people to work in a certain area........ sounds like communism to me.
If it comes to that you are correct. Far better to make it worth their while and have them chose to live in those communities. If it takes more money as an incentive than so be it. All for balancing the budget but some things should not be cut unless there is concrete evidence of "fat."
Like the so called gravy train, that rob ford said he would find in Toronto....but never did. His bro.......same thing provincially.
If you subsidize a doctors salaries or education in any way then I can see them being forced to work in an area at least for a few years. Obviously doctors do not want to live or have a practice in the north otherwise we'd have a lot more willing to come here and stay awhile. Its probably much easier to establish a practice in the south where the bulk of the population is. Money too is an issue as doctors are getting educated in Canada then soon migrate to the States.
The trick is to treat your employees as well as those in a union shop. Most workers don't want to unionize IMO. If they are being treated fairly I think the employer can avoid unions although they certainly are aggressive in their efforts. Lindmar, Toyota, Honda, etc seem to have avoided unionizing. Not sure how though?
My sister comes down to London from Thunder Bay for pacemaker surgery. Her and her friend are covered for flights, meals, accomodations, taxis, etc. People from the owen sound area travel to London for the same type of treatment. NO subsidy! I realize it's expensive to travel but Southerners need to travel 3 hours for treatment as well and there's no government help.
Well, let us know when you can travel from Thunder Bay to TO in 3 hours w/o having to book a flight or having to stay over 3 nights in a hotel. That individual paid the same for hospital services during their career as did the person from the south. If government can't provide health services in the north then a patients trip should darn well be subsidized.
Just to be clear, teachers PA days, are paid, but they are at work for those days, it's not a day off for them, and the 2 months off, they get paid for those 2 months off by having their pay cut through out the year and given back to them for those 2 months while off, and when they retire, their benefits stop also