Threats?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by canadaman30

Our liberals support these criminal actions of by allowing this to go on un-challenged by law enforcement.

Maybe gun owners have learned a few lessons from FN on taking actions against oppressive government. Seems their actions are working because we have a government that won't challenge their criminal acts, nor attempt to ban guns from FN's

---

Please tell us that you're not advocating that firearm owners use those tactics. It's common knowledge that FN has the federal government by the short and curlies in their ability to manipulate "political correctness" to the point the federal government is paralyzed in every way to deal with them. Not so for ordinary Canadians. Rest well assured that should firearms owners resort to such tactics,the power of The Crown will visit hellfire and mass destruction on firearm ownership,not just some firearms,but,all firearms. You've just seen how an innocuous post has just been deliberately misconstrued and turned against you by Liberal Party supporters. Be very careful what you put in print.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilroy

In case you missed my post above I will put it here because you should be blinded by the facts from your own often cited source of accurate Conservative News. Enjoy


So according to the right wing Rebel news and their commentators on this video the blame for all this INACTION is placed at the foot of JULIAN FANTINO you remember that OPP Commissioner and Conservative Justice Minister.

Julian at Caledonia sat on his hands and this has continued and now the Premier Conservative Dog Ford he is now sitting on his hand's.

THIS IS Ezra Levant at Rebel News it does not get any better than this him and his guest David Menzies lambasting the Conservative Premier and Julian Fantino.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjKBTp0r4sk

---

The beginning of that doesn't look like peaceful protests to me [emoji3577].



Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilroy

Everybody on the forum can read what you wrote its plain and simple and when you get caught with your pants down you resort to the usual name calling. LOL

---

It's not whether you can read it, its whether you can comprehend it.
If the first nations are excluded from the guns that are banned across the country and Canada30 says the fn's should be banned as well, I hardly think that paints the picture that you're trying to create. What you're doing is called racebaiting 101.
Fishermcann is the master at it.
Not surprised you're cheerleading though, considering how well-conditioned you are to the system.
https://youtu.be/4m4_KibqaRU

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by onelessarrow

It's not whether you can read it, its whether you can comprehend it.
If the first nations are excluded from the guns that are banned across the country and Canada30 says the fn's should be banned as well, I hardly think that paints the picture that you're trying to create. What you're doing is called racebaiting 101.
Fishermcann is the master at it.
Not surprised you're cheerleading though, considering how well-conditioned you are to the system.
https://youtu.be/4m4_KibqaRU

---

Bang on Onelessarrow, at least your awake
Then we have a leftist member on here that threatens to give my address/personal information as intimidation. Its ok though I won't let it hurt my feelings...lol

If they can't take them from or ban them from first Nation's that means everyone else gets to keep theirs too doesn't it ?

Why as a government do they keep dividing the people ? We are all Canadians we should have all the same rules .

Seems simple [emoji16]



Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by canadaman30

Bang on Onelessarrow, at least your awake
Then we have a leftist member on here that threatens to give my address/personal information as intimidation. Its ok though I won't let it hurt my feelings...lol

---

You posted your address and invited a fellow member of this site to come fight you. If you don't like what i said, come and fight me about it....... I just said, I could pass that information on to someone, who because of your comments , might be interested. If that is intimidation, what the heck do you call what you did? Don't wine about it ,if you do the same thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trimmer21

Please tell us that you're not advocating that firearm owners use those tactics. It's common knowledge that FN has the federal government by the short and curlies in their ability to manipulate "political correctness" to the point the federal government is paralyzed in every way to deal with them. Not so for ordinary Canadians. Rest well assured that should firearms owners resort to such tactics,the power of The Crown will visit hellfire and mass destruction on firearm ownership,not just some firearms,but,all firearms. You've just seen how an innocuous post has just been deliberately misconstrued and turned against you by Liberal Party supporters. Be very careful what you put in print.

---

That is precisely what he is suggesting. There are emotional weaklings in Canada who own guns and threaten a violent response to bans. They spout silliness like, "the government will get my guns bullets first!, "government will have to pry my guns from my cold dead hands!" and the always favourite "Molon Labe!"

You are also spot on about what will happen to him should he try to turn his Red Dawn fantasies into reality. You are also correct about and the damage such idiotic statements do to all of us which is why we must distance ourselves from the weak and delusional among us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fishermccann

You posted your address and invited a fellow member of this site to come fight you. If you don't like what i said, come and fight me about it....... I just said, I could pass that information on to someone, who because of your comments , might be interested. If that is intimidation, what the heck do you call what you did? Don't wine about it ,if you do the same thing.

---

Fish,I think you're assuming too much out of emotion and a desire to "one-up" someone as a last word. How do you know that address wasn't bogus like 99.99% of the rest of the BS on the internet? Because there's many trolls and some who are extremely mentally unbalanced,posting perceived names and addresses could really threaten the security of someone's home and family. Some posters need to take a serious step back,take a critical look at actuality and cool your jets before someone gets hurt.

T 21...Would not matter if it was a real address ...I DID NOT post his address . He did, previously ,when inviting a forum member over for some fisticuffs. How is it any different than the posting about Gils background, name and picture. Of a retired cop for gosh sake. Did the poster not think that he might have made some 'friends', in his working life. Yup they thought it was a gotcha moment, all in good fun. What is good for the goose.......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trimmer21

Fish,I think you're assuming too much out of emotion and a desire to "one-up" someone as a last word. How do you know that address wasn't bogus like 99.99% of the rest of the BS on the internet? Because there's many trolls and some who are extremely mentally unbalanced,posting perceived names and addresses could really threaten the security of someone's home and family. Some posters need to take a serious step back,take a critical look at actuality and cool your jets before someone gets hurt.

---

There are many unbalanced people out there which is why a CCFR rep posting the name, address, and pictures of the staff of a temp agency that may have been involved in the buy back is seriously bad behavior and merits condemnation by responsible gun owners.

If some clown wants to post his own address what happens subsequently is on him and no one else.