The Great Reset?

New meat labs sustainable development brought to you by WEF strategic partners
"The current system of raising and processing animals to meet the growing global demand for meat is not sustainable."

https://www.believermeats.com/

Farming done by the people not a sustainable way so destroy them and close them down.

https://www.theguardian.com/environm...tch-government

And I was censored from you tube for posting the "truth" it only went against the narrative. Couldn't show how Ontario is loosing 300 acres of farmland to development per day. Again a Wef strategic partner owned by Google.

https://beta.ctvnews.ca/local/windso...50372.amp.html


All part of the great reset aka agenda.

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

Fish food: You've got 12 posts here , one after another, with no responses from others. Time to back off Sir.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sharon

Fish food: You've got 12 posts here , one after another, with no responses from others. Time to back off Sir.

---

And to think the ice isn't even scratched lol. I'll make 1 more post of my concerns and give it a rest.

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

Thank you for co operating. I appreciate it.

I would suggest everyone to look into the WEF world economic forum they tell you everything about what their plan is. Don't take my word for it, they say it all and how they use strategic partners who they selected that have great influencing powers and have the same vision for the future.
Spend some time looking at their beliefs, mottos ,history, their mission, thier community members partners and strategic partners. They even partnered with UN to FastTrack the agenda. The great reset is the agenda it's both the 2030 and 2050. When they admit that "own the science " it's true but they are using their own scientists as they have thousands of partners.
When an organization admit they own everything they really do they have thousands of business under their foot all across the board with many political leaders around the world.
They have some good ideas and yes we do need change for the better but not this way.
Our finance minister sits on the board and many of her close contacts are within the wef community. Being influenced for the beliefs and changing the future to what they want.

Few more examples before I go lay it to rest posted a few up in previous posts.
Gilroy will love this one. Who is our government funding and supporting? The wef

Visa 50 million from our government to a strategic partner in the wef.

The first cricket plant for human protein 8.5 million invented so we can eat less meat. Meat labs are also forecasted for Canada the first is going in the usa 22 million pounds of lab grown meat it can produce. The first of many . It's why the second largest food exports in Dutch will loose thousands of farms and many will be forced to close. The people protesting are just anti climate.

What about 200 million into Canadian vaccines the government gave out? Astra zenica ,merk and pfizer. All partners to the wef with pfizer a strategic partner.

Don't forget about the new plant to be built in Quebec an mrna facility government didn't fund the building just secured the jabs through a contract for rsv and new flu vaccines. Again the wef partners.

Don't take my word just go look yourself as see where we are heading it's all posted for all to see. https://www.weforum.org/

Did I mention the Canadian pension plan is invested in a wef house investment group? Yes helping push up the prices of homes while it competes in the market.

No conflicts of interest at all.

With so many political leaders you only need a few to push certain things in each place and eventually it all comes together.

Ever wonder why Sri Lanka collapsed? Wef policies. What about the ftx wef was on board then scrubbed it when it collapsed.



Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

Although I do not post on this thread I do find it informative as I would guess many others do as well by the more then 4000 views, unless this is just the mods watching closely to put up the count. Is there some reason you are upset or offended by this thread that makes you want fishfood to stop??
Not to cause trouble or look for a timeout here Sharon, but this looks more like you trying to shut the thread down for personal reasons without just locking it like you are able to do as a mod.
Just curious as I have very little skin in the thread.
John

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by johnjyb

Although I do not post on this thread I do find it informative as I would guess many others do as well by the more then 4000 views, unless this is just the mods watching closely to put up the count. Is there some reason you are upset or offended by this thread that makes you want fishfood to stop??
Not to cause trouble or look for a timeout here Sharon, but this looks more like you trying to shut the thread down for personal reasons without just locking it like you are able to do as a mod.
Just curious as I have very little skin in the thread.
John

---

I believe in second and third unofficial warnings before shutting down a thread. I rarely give warnings publicly , but in this case I have already tried to solve the problem by PM. so shifted to a public rebuke. Looks like that was a bad idea. :)
.

Rule 20 being broken:

20. "Bumping of posts is not recommended. Please make sure to wait a MINIMUM 48 hours from the time of your last post before you bump your thread. Please note that this rule does NOT apply to the For Sale By Owner section ( that section is a minimum 7-days from last post date ).
The chronic posts one after the other sometimes minutes apart is kind of the reason for this rule or consideration." quote

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by johnjyb

Although I do not post on this thread I do find it informative as I would guess many others do as well by the more then 4000 views, unless this is just the mods watching closely to put up the count. Is there some reason you are upset or offended by this thread that makes you want fishfood to stop??
Not to cause trouble or look for a timeout here Sharon, but this looks more like you trying to shut the thread down for personal reasons without just locking it like you are able to do as a mod.
Just curious as I have very little skin in the thread.
John

---

You're probably right post count reflexs mods keeping tabs on the forum in order to facilitate discussion without it becoming a soap box.
Remember this forum has a mod team and all actions are reviewed and rest assured a consensus is strived for to eliminate personal bias.
As Stated above please follow rule 20 guidance to keep this thread open.

Sure like to know why my post was removed while just expressing an opinion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fisherman

Sure like to know why my post was removed while just expressing an opinion.

---

What post are you talking about? The one from this morning is still there. Post #85 in this thread.