Originally Posted by
welsh
The law applies to everyone, provided the elements of the offence are made out.
As I pointed out above, there is a clear defence to the loaded firearm charge. It would be unlikely that anyone would ever be charged with loading a firearm in a self-defence scenario, as the charge is farcical if the real issue is assault, attempted murder, or murder. The intent of the law is to deter people from keeping guns loaded where they have no need of a loaded gun.
I am generally opposed to mandatory minimums because they remove judicial discretion. In Forcillo's case, however, I'm not much bothered. There are no s.7 grounds to complain that the punishment is inappropriate, because the intent element is not really in doubt: intent is the heart of attempted murder. We can make a sound argument that an attempted murder with a firearm ought to be punished more severely than an attempted murder with a knife, because knives do not kill innocents passers-by.
He did the crime, and he can do the time.