DU not supporting Gun owners

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MikePal

If you were to believe in Sprite's bravado Trimmer, if they lost all their guns and the ability to hunt waterfowl the DU membership will still continue with their conservation efforts. No more calendars, Gun raffles or hunting related activities..but they would still carry on for the love of the ducks. :)

---

When the government makes cuts and stops financial support, where will they be then?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fox

The rules have changed now, there are protections legally in place for wetlands..

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sprite

I call baloney.

---

Fox is right...The MNRF is now the responsible ministry for Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) program under the Planning Act.

You may want to read up....

https://www.ontario.ca/page/wetland-conservation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by canadaman30

When the government makes cuts and stops financial support, where will they be then?

---

Well they would be liars if they did not continue to make sure all those wetlands were bought and protected as they are now, I think they would have to give more money to offset the government loses.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MikePal

Fox is right...The MNRF is now the responsible ministry for Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) program under the Planning Act.

You may want to read up....

https://www.ontario.ca/page/wetland-conservation

---

No read up required, I work in the field.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trimmer21

Semi-auto and pump shotguns can hold 5 or more rounds when the plug is removed. Anyone can remove a plug because the plugs aren't permanent. That puts them squarely in the sights of the anti gunners when unspecified blanket legislation is enacted by the usual "know nothings" as we saw in Australia and New Zealand.

---

What was said was that every shotgun on the DU calendar would be banned which is complete bullsh-t. None of those guns will hold more than 5 with the plug removed unless a magazine extension is attached. All of the guns on the calendar can continue to be privately held in New Zealand and Australia although there are additional restrictions in Australia.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

What was said was that every shotgun on the DU calendar would be banned which is complete bullsh-t. None of those guns will hold more than 5 with the plug removed unless a magazine extension is attached. All of the guns on the calendar can continue to be privately held in New Zealand and Australia although there are additional restrictions in Australia.

---

Consider that a shotgun can hold five 3" shells without the plug, how many Federal shortys could you stuff in there?

I'm not sold that anything is going to happen just yet because the loss in tax dollars would hurt. Libs are going to try and smooth talk their way into as many more votes as possible.

Say the "black gun" ban gets passed, you think it stops there? The antis will pick away piece by piece every time there is a lib PM, like a gangrenous wound consuming a finger, limb then finally taking the body.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oaknut

Consider that a shotgun can hold five 3" shells without the plug, how many Federal shortys could you stuff in there?

I'm not sold that anything is going to happen just yet because the loss in tax dollars would hurt. Libs are going to try and smooth talk their way into as many more votes as possible.

Say the "black gun" ban gets passed, you think it stops there? The antis will pick away piece by piece every time there is a lib PM, like a gangrenous wound consuming a finger, limb then finally taking the body.

---

Shotgun magazine capacity is determined by the shell for which it is chambered by both the RCMP and COs. There is not a single shotgun shown in the DU calendar that will hold five of the shells shells for which it was chambered in the magazine unless an extension is added.

Your overwrought and juvenile comparison to gangrene notwithstanding, assault rifles were banned in the UK and Australia decades ago and gun owners in both countries can still own other guns so all this BS about all guns being banned next is just that. BS.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

Shotgun magazine capacity is determined by the shell for which it is chambered by both the RCMP and COs. There is not a single shotgun shown in the DU calendar that will hold five of the shells shells for which it was chambered in the magazine unless an extension is added.

Your overwrought and juvenile comparison to gangrene notwithstanding, assault rifles were banned in the UK and Australia decades ago and gun owners in both countries can still own other guns so all this BS about all guns being banned next is just that. BS.

---

Overwrought and juvenile, for sure! [emoji106]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/reason....england/%3famp


Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oaknut

Overwrought and juvenile, for sure! [emoji106]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/reason....england/%3famp


Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

---

If you can't tell the difference between a knife and a gun perhaps your problem lies elsewhere.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Badenoch

If you can't tell the difference between a knife and a gun perhaps your problem lies elsewhere.

---

Now now, let's not get grumpy.
It's a pretty simple breadcrumb trail to follow.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk