TIME TO SWING THE POLE OUR WAY GUYS.
FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW NEAR AND FAR
VOTE!
http://www.thesudburystar.com/2016/0...ssary-predator
Printable View
TIME TO SWING THE POLE OUR WAY GUYS.
FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW NEAR AND FAR
VOTE!
http://www.thesudburystar.com/2016/0...ssary-predator
Bunny-hugger article. "nuf said.
I submitted my vote
My vote is in!
Voted!
no is still outnumbering yes votes 2:1....scary thought.... I voted as well thx for posting
To me the readers survey does not match the article which i find is usually the case as these are surveys that the writer creates. The question posed is "Should it become easier to hunt wolves in Ontario?". No where in the article do they mention that Ontario is making it easier to kill wolfs. All they say is
"At present Ontarians are allowed to hunt wolves, but must purchase a seal (which costs about $11) and can only harvest two per year, whether they are grey wolves or coyotes.
But a legislative change has been proposed, noted Barron, that would remove the requirement to purchase a seal, as well as "open the bag limit for coyotes in Northern Ontario."
It does not say they are removing the bag limit of 2 on wolves only removing the seal requirement which to me having to buy a seal doesn't make it harder to kill your limit of wolfs.
These surveys don't mean anything other than to engage the reader in providing false hope.
Also, this group is also focused on wolfs, they mentioned nothing about the coyote changes which to me would be the biggest change by opening the bag limit.
Just my 2 cents on the article.
I'd expect an article like that in southern Ontario BUT not in Sudbury! or Timmins or North Bay.
I would when it comes to bunny huggers and newspaper sales. BS baffles brains,every time.Quote:
Originally Posted by SK33T3R
Skewing poll results doesnt have any value to me. Id rsther get a notion of what actual public perception is (yes, I realize it could be skewed the otherway too).