Poilievre SLAMS Trudeau and Liberal Canadian media on This Week In Canada! Episode 29 - YouTube
Printable View
No trash .
Reality what's going to happen in the coming years with Justin at the helm.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
.... you seem to have your names and pronouns mixed up...
Thanks for posting that on OODs Forum. Trudeau is a P.O.S. and a poor excuse for a Canadian. Trudeau on facts is pathetic but good in delivery and pathetic people only care about the presentation. Why do people vote for trash?
There I fixed it and cleaned up some of the text too. I mean look at how well Justlied can lie... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY3I2ewuxQ0
Apparently we are now above the $1,000,000,000,000 defict mark in the last day or so.
How much more will it cost for more lockdowns. More than they planned that's for sure.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
We need people like Pierre in the light of the lies, coverups and distortions we see from CBC and the Liberals...
"Truth eludes us if we do not pursue it with constant attention." - Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Real Truth might not be popular or pretty but it does matter more than Liberal "truth" and unicorns and rainbows on sunny days.
We are living in a financial powder keg and giving off sparks and one day the interest rates will rise, money won't be available to be borrowed or there will be such a financial collapse that the 2030 WEF agenda of people owning nothing will come true, there will be no hope and to be forgiven the debt they will essentially sign up to be serfs for the elites.
Ysyg.
Couple things.
He is a politician. One that is playing to his audience. No different than any other. So in that your right. I liked Angry Tom who he reminds me of.
It’s the opposition job. And ours to hold the current admin accountable. Shred who ever about whatever. Many seem to have forgotten that
He is also spot on with respect to the way the Left reacts to it.
Pierre talking to two kid's in their bedrooms to a viewership of 36,000. Ok so he criticizes Canada for having any thing to do with China BUT at the end of the video he wants to sell all our natural gas to them and prop up the Communist Regime. LOL.
He managed to celebrate Paul Martin for saving the country's back in the 1990,s by firing folk's all over the place who then have no money, but at the same time want's us to spend our way out of this type of mess.
He attacks the government for upcoming spending, even although he does not know what they are going to spend on YET and at the same time wants to spend to open mine's and help the oil and gas sector.
So the intent of the video is to try and spread Conservative influence on social media where its now posted and the video will be critiqued by opposite thinkers, who will be attacked, which will only entrench their position. Alrighty.
You can expect the government to pay out just as much as the first time around.
It's not going to be over anytime soon
The lockdowns are the same as the first time around what makes them think it will change this the around . Took months in the non flu season .
Remember we never really wanted to eliminate this virus just to slow it down . Eliminating it wouldn't line up their plans would it.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
FF So far I have received a one time payment for Covid and I was pretty happy to get it but it would make very little difference to me. I know I will be in for much more tax hikes in the future but I do not begrudge folk's who really need this money.
Of course there should be much ,much ,better accounting for where all this cash has gone and I think that's just one of the thing's that he people riled up.
No clue as usual ... the point of the video is to educate as many people as possible that the Liberal's are fu***** Canada's future up badly with huge deficits and you can include the lies and coverups and most of their policies I would say too.
So your plan to fix the looming deficit would be... spend until we die?
The cuts that are going to be necessary to fix this and even get back to a balanced budget are going to make those cuts look unnoticeable. The interest on the deficit the LIbErals have created alone will probably .... well let's see... the lies since 2015 and now are about $482,000,000,000 given the last estimate of their to keep hidden spending/budget .. so at say 1.5% for a low amount (REMEMBER when interest rates go up so does the interest payments.) they have added $7,230,000,000 to the required annual spending and if you go up 1% to 2.5% it is $12,050,000,000 PER YEAR ON THE NEW DEBT since 2015.
https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-bo...m-purpose.html
So if you cancelled.... border services and CBC that would make up half the amount THEY ADDED (NOT including previous debt interest payments), so where are you going to take the money? Military? Pensions? Health? ... more tax increases?
... or are you an advocate of the Trudeau approved "Great Reset" ... with all Canadians are either the elite or serfs with the serfs owning nothing and being happy and renting anything they need... and since you have no privacy the "being Happy" comes with an implied "or else".
Well, almost no clue, you got part of it right atleast, to spread the Conservative influence... work, prosperity, integrity, openness, ethics... all the things the Liberals have disdain and ignore. Education and facts and honesty are essential for the improvement of a society ... and Canada has a Drama teacher with silly socks, that lies constantly as a PM .... sad!
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Winston Churchill
May you one day learn truth... it changes your whole view on life, ethics and enlightens you onto how exceedingly corrupt the gov't we have currently is.
Pierre is on point.
"The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it" George Orwell
Gilroy 68 large Canadian company's received 1 billion in benifets yet they paid out 5 billion in to shareholders.
Why did they need the benefits ?
As just mentioned and in the past the media being paid out will not talk badly of their boss aka Justin. They don't want you to know what they have plans for .
Even Australia media is making fun of this global reset .
It's not going to be pretty at all .
If we join one nation who decides what's good ? How many small towns will suffer or be forgotten ? It's better to have smaller groups like we have provincially wide.
One nation world will be a disastrous decision . The opportunity this virus has opened up will be disastrous for a reset.
It won't bring opportunity like they say
You are just told what to do .
Just like a vaccine we are told it's the only way out but the truth is it's not .
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
Any of the large companies that took money when not entitled should have to pay it back.
Australia and Canada are both cutting their own throats, why is Australia and Canada supplying all of China's energy needs.
If we cut of their energy supplies their economy would grind to a halt.
Well if the gov't offers it up without restriction they will take it, remember the estimate that the gov't was paying about $14K PER JOB...
Canadian companies isn't absolutely terrible ... just really bad given everything we see.... this is though!
https://thepostmillennial.com/state-...y-wage-subsidy
Air China, a subsidiary of the state-owned China National Aviation Holdings, received wage subsidies. Air China experienced a substantial revenue drop in the first half of 2020, making them eligible for the CEWS. Air China also collaborates with Huawei. Another Chinese state-owned airline, China Southern Airlines, received subsidies under the program.
Another major company which received subsidies under the program is a Toronto branch of the Bank of China.
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, another state-owned Chinese bank, which has been connected to money laundering, received CEWS support.
...
China Mobile received wage subsidies under the program and, according to the US government, has links to the People's Liberation Army (PLA), China's military. Last month, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order banning Americans from investing in companies with links to the PLA, with China Mobile being one of the companies on the list. In Canada, however, such a company is apparently applicable for state subsidies.
..
A final company to receive financial support from the CEWS program is Petrochina which, despite the Trudeau government's supposed commitment to curbing climate change, is responsible for nearly 1% of all greenhouse gas emissions emitted globally over the past 270 years even though the company was only founded in 1999.
If these companies don't tick you off...
Somewhat off topic but it happens.
This is just some of it. Some notable names in here.
Quebecor
Rogers ( which played fast with its accounting from the sounds of it).
Not sure if the list that's been revealed thus far includes companies that bought shares back, or it's just those that paid dividends to shareholders. Which removes shares from the float ( shares available to buy/sell). So each remaining share has more value and it's price goes up ( capital appreciation). There's nothing illegal in what they did. Not defending it, just saying it's not illegal.
So where's the problem?
Answer: Not the companies nor CEOs
CEOs raked in hefty dividends as their companies accepted CEWS, Financial Post analysis finds | Financial Post
Remember, own nothing, no gas....You get to choose one of the 3 positions on the right of this image if you are lucky I guess.. the guy on the left is a Liberal party member I guess
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdo..._and_Serfs.jpg
Personally I like PP - however - he is just another craven political opportunist trying to keep his name relevant in the public sphere. So, the CPC is really no different in policies of Trudeau WRT Carbon taxes, state surveillance, supply management, the are certainly not "Conservative" or "small government" mantra anymore. But see - that is the problem with identity politics and how you craft your messaging- it is not designed to help anyone - only to capture the voter demographics it was intended for.
Which came first, the chicken or the egg...Meaning.Quote:
only to capture the voter demographics it was intended for.
In the end, are they not a reflection of society.
We gripe about them and how corrupt, how morally bankrupt they are, how one party is in bed with A, or B, etc, et al, ad nauseum.
Perhaps, but it's really "us".
I like PP, he reminds me of Angry Tom. But lets not fool ourselves.
...........