Nicely put by Matt Gurney....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwc7z25N82k
Printable View
Nicely put by Matt Gurney....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwc7z25N82k
Agreed you can't put it any plainer than that well said but in reference to hitting truedope where it hurts would require testicles on his part. Remember he is a self proclaimed feminist.
Gun control does not make sense to a lot of people because they are not looking at the big picture.
It is a UN agenda and part of the Global Reset to which Trudeau has sworn allegiance.
Disarm the population to prevent future uprising as they know full well what they intend on implementing in the not so distant future will not be palatable.
The same is currently happening in the USA under Biden.
So the average Canadian voter lives in blissful ignorance that all gun control is simple smoke and mirrors item. Sound about right.
You don't stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut
Well he is right the average Canadian cares about safety and security which the Liberals have tried to provide and the Conservative's look like they care about gun owners and not about safety and security. Take it to the next election.
Oh,oh wait a minute Erin has gone completely dark on this issue as of his last weeks Conference and could only mention the word "hunters" once in a half hour speech and nothing challenging the new gun control laws. Cricket's....
Legitimate average Canadian gun owners are safe and secure. No need to keep revisiting it ad nauseum.
Only Trudeau is concerned about it since it is part of the puppet masters plans.
Look up the UN agenda.
Obviously as a gun owner yourself you must be suffering from anxiety since you support JT's agenda.
The Cpc certainly has within its strategy to continue being viewed as the party that defends the rights of law abiding gun owners. This bill won’t be strategic ground leading into the election the way c-68 was. They’ll certainly voice opposition. They won’t campaign on overturning it.
Exactly, the same old, the same old. That is why I will look for somewhere else to park my vote or simply not vote at all. As long as bill C-68 stands, my right to own firearms has been compromised by the need to have a license to do so. Their is a sizable difference between having a right and having a privilege.
You don't stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut
Don't you get it? You gave no 'right' to own firearms. You have them because the government lets you have them, with some restrictions. A privilege if you will. If 90% of all Canadian voters, for all parties, decide they will be no more, they are gone.
Okay, they won't be 'gone', just put into hiding and unable to use. De facto , does not work in a court of law.
Why ? Because a poster said it was his 'right' to have firearms. I was just correcting him. In Canada it is not a 'right'. It is incorrect to say so. I have many firearms, I am not an anti.
Please do.....I have never , ever, said that I have no firearms. As many on here can attest, I have always said that I am a multiple firearms owner. Plus Excal and Bear bows. It is a privilege to have my guns, not my right.
In Canada you have the right to own property...that includes a Firearm. You are however required to follow the rules as laid out in the Firearms Act..ie be Licensed etc..
Quote:
In one significant development after 1983, on 15 October 1987, Mr. John Reimer M.P. introduced a motion in the House of Commons to amend the Constitution Act, 1982 so as to include property rights within the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Mr. Reimer’s motion was amended so that it expressed support in principle for a property rights amendment, rather than proposing such a specific amendment itself. The motion, as amended, was adopted by a 108 to 16 vote, and thus became a resolution of the House, as follows:
That in the opinion of this House, the Constitution Act, 1982 should be amended in order to recognize the right to enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof, except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice, and in keeping with the tradition of the usual federal-provincial consultative process.
MP....Try to tell that to someone, who had that 'right', revoked. Maybe by an upset ex -wife. 'He threatened me',...... privilege gone... but you have the 'right' , to go to court.
I dug one up to refresh YOUR MEMORY https://www.oodmag.com/community/sho...-Problem/page2
Post # 12
G. Don't worry about it....... Impact has been around here long enough, to know what he stated was untrue.
Well our Bill of Rights say otherwise..we have the right to own a firearm......but you are correct, if the sitting government change the 'Act' (laws/regulations) that right can be stripped in the interest of Public Safety.
The Supreme Court has yet to rule if the OIC can be adopted into law.
This was one of the main questions I asked myself because the answer seemed to me very superficial but strange. I don't think I'm the only one with such a judgment about guns. It's legal until the mass killings started. I think you should be careful with it and use it for its intended purpose without threatening someone close to you. I purchased guns for myself solely for hunting boars and deer. The only one I used for that was this: https://elementarmament.com/product/glock-grip-tape/. It has been extraordinarily helpful to me, so I have begun to take more interest in this topic to be more knowledgeable.
The average American would be absolutely aghast and horror-striken if they knew how diametrically opposed the politics of their neighbors to the north whom they believe have a free and democratic society like their own. The fact is Canada has a free and democratic veneer,but,underneath currents of Marxism,socialism and communism percolate just under the surface.
Here we go again......do not kid yourself for one second. Guns will not go away just because they are banned - classic Liberal white board logic. They will only stop the legal buying and selling of them but they will still be out there. If rural Canadians do not believe and get behind the ban it will simply NOT happen. Just because Citiots in Toronto buy into Billy's cult of "making Canadians safer" while illegal guns and gangs run the jungle, does not mean everyone else in Canada does.
Yes, you're right. Banning guns doesn't mean that they all will just disappear. It will be harder to get it.
But, let's have a look at US. There are so many talks about gun control, changing laws, and petitions, but still, it's possible for everyone to get a gun